dmd 1.061 and 2.046 beta

Fix hanging problem.

http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip

At least on Windows, std.complex isn't linked into the lib (this was
true of the last release as well, but I think it's critical). Probably
just a trivial makefile issue. So this program fails to link:
=====
import std.complex;
void main() {}
======

On 9 May 2010 20:08, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Fix hanging problem.
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

Walter Bright wrote:
> Fix hanging problem.
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
I confirm, it's OK now with all my code on Linux.
And it actually compiles faster now!
I can now use the advantage of fixed DWARF.
Thank you.

-- 
Alex Makhotin,
the founder of BITPROX,
http://bitprox.com

Don Clugston wrote:
> At least on Windows, std.complex isn't linked into the lib (this was
> true of the last release as well, but I think it's critical). Probably
> just a trivial makefile issue. So this program fails to link:
> =====
> import std.complex;
> void main() {}
> ======
> 
I confirm, the error is:

Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D3std7complex12__ModuleInfoZ

-- 
Alex Makhotin,
the founder of BITPROX,
http://bitprox.com

is it possible to inlcude changeset 477 into this beta for testing ?

On 09.05.2010 20:08, Walter Bright wrote:
> Fix hanging problem.
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

Revision 478 introduced a regression, I receive segmentation fault while compiling qtd. I quickly ran dmd under gdb and got this backtrace http://pastebin.com/1YK51aWH . Unfortunately I don't have time at the moment to try reducing it to a testcase.

On 10 May 2010 11:44, Extrawurst <spam at extrawurst.org> wrote:

> is it possible to inlcude changeset 477 into this beta for testing ?
>
>
> On 09.05.2010 20:08, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> Fix hanging problem.
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20100510/6acf2a75/attachment.html>

What about 477?

Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> Revision 478 introduced a regression, I receive segmentation fault while compiling qtd. I quickly ran dmd under gdb and got this backtrace  http://pastebin.com/1YK51aWH . Unfortunately I don't have time at the moment to try reducing it to a testcase.
>
> On 10 May 2010 11:44, Extrawurst <spam at extrawurst.org <mailto:spam at extrawurst.org>> wrote:
>
>     is it possible to inlcude changeset 477 into this beta for testing ?
>
>
>     On 09.05.2010 20:08, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>         Fix hanging problem.
>
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         dmd-beta mailing list
>         dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>         http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     dmd-beta mailing list
>     dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>     http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Revision 477 built it fine. Looks like it is because 478 or combination of both.

On 11 May 2010 00:13, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> What about 477?
>
> Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>
>> Revision 478 introduced a regression, I receive segmentation fault while compiling qtd. I quickly ran dmd under gdb and got this backtrace http://pastebin.com/1YK51aWH . Unfortunately I don't have time at the moment to try reducing it to a testcase.
>>
>> On 10 May 2010 11:44, Extrawurst <spam at extrawurst.org <mailto: spam at extrawurst.org>> wrote:
>>
>>    is it possible to inlcude changeset 477 into this beta for testing ?
>>
>>
>>    On 09.05.2010 20:08, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>        Fix hanging problem.
>>
>>        http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>>        http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        dmd-beta mailing list
>>        dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>>
>>        http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    dmd-beta mailing list
>>    dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>>
>>    http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20100511/82f4f9f2/attachment.html>

I found a couple problems, don't know if they're causing the problem you're seeing. Just uploaded a new beta to solve them.

Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
> Revision 477 built it fine. Looks like it is because 478 or combination of both.
>
> On 11 May 2010 00:13, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com <mailto:walter at digitalmars.com>> wrote:
>
>     What about 477?
>
>     Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
>
>         Revision 478 introduced a regression, I receive segmentation
>         fault while compiling qtd. I quickly ran dmd under gdb and got
>         this backtrace  http://pastebin.com/1YK51aWH . Unfortunately I
>         don't have time at the moment to try reducing it to a testcase.
>
>         On 10 May 2010 11:44, Extrawurst <spam at extrawurst.org
>         <mailto:spam at extrawurst.org> <mailto:spam at extrawurst.org
>         <mailto:spam at extrawurst.org>>> wrote:
>
>            is it possible to inlcude changeset 477 into this beta for
>         testing ?
>
>
>            On 09.05.2010 20:08, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>                Fix hanging problem.
>
>                http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>                http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>
>                _______________________________________________
>                dmd-beta mailing list
>                dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>         <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>>
>
>                http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>            _______________________________________________
>            dmd-beta mailing list
>            dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>         <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>>
>
>            http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         dmd-beta mailing list
>         dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>         http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     dmd-beta mailing list
>     dmd-beta at puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>     http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>wrote:

> I found a couple problems, don't know if they're causing the problem you're seeing. Just uploaded a new beta to solve them.
>
>
The latest beta doesn't segfault but there is another problem:

/media/RESOURCES/d-projects/qtd-trunk/qtd/output/build/qt/gui/QPaintDevice.d(259): Error: no property 'PaintDeviceMetric' for type 'qt.gui.QPaintDevice.QPaintDevice' /media/RESOURCES/d-projects/qtd-trunk/qtd/output/build/qt/gui/QPaintDevice.d(259): Error: QPaintDevice.PaintDeviceMetric is used as a type

It is caused by an enum defined in an abstract class and forward referenced in an interface implemented by that abstract class:

abstract class QPaintDevice : QtdObject, IQPaintDevice
{
    enum PaintDeviceMetric {
    }
}

interface IQPaintDevice
{
        public int metric(QPaintDevice.PaintDeviceMetric metric) const;
}

The design is not quite right and we will move the enum into the interface. Yet, I think the code should compile without problems. We'll try to provide a test-case later.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20100511/750b8cd4/attachment.html>

Forums