http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip

Docs for std.container are missing.

On 10 June 2010 04:10, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

Don Clugston wrote:
> Docs for std.container are missing.
>
>
> 

Will fix. Thanks.

hi,

there seems to be a regression regarding compile time evaluation of startsWith:

import std.string;

const bool ok = startsWith("ab", 'a');
const bool fails = startsWith("ab", "a");

produces
c:\l\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\functional.d(176): Error:
static assert  "Bad binary function q{a == b}. You need to use a valid D
expression using symbols a of type dchar and b of type string."
c:\l\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\functional.d(179):
instantiated from here: Body!(dchar,string)
c:\l\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\algorithm.d(1981):
instantiated from here: result!(dchar,string)

This worked for me in 2.046.

Rainer

Walter Bright wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

maybe not so important for the release, but...

Being the author myself, I still detest the naming of druntime/src/core/thread_helper and dll_helper. With the sys folder now established, I'd like to see them being moved into core/sys/windows and maybe just named thread and dll.

Rainer

Walter Bright wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

We are now coming up on 6 D2 and 5 D1 releases since you last updated bugzilla's version dropdown...



----- Original Message ----
> From: Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>
> To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
> Sent: Wed, June 9, 2010 10:10:19 PM
> Subject: [dmd-beta] dmd 1.062 and 2.047 beta
> 
> 
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta
> mailing list

> href="mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com">dmd-beta at puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 10 June 2010 14:19, Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> We are now coming up on 6 D2 and 5 D1 releases since you last updated bugzilla's version dropdown...

I wish we'd get rid of them entirely. They don't add any value at all. The only thing that's relevant is D1 only, D2 only, D1+D2.

Using 2.047 on Windows 2008, i see the code

	char[3] tmp = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
	writeln(tmp);

print abc<randombytes> (in debug builds at least).

possibly because the change in http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1611 doesn't handle non-null terminated character arrays?

Yeah I still haven't gotten around to looking at that. Not as much of an issue for this release though, since TDPL doesn't talk about core.thread.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 10, 2010, at 12:24 AM, Rainer Schuetze <r.sagitario at gmx.de> wrote:

> maybe not so important for the release, but...
>
> Being the author myself, I still detest the naming of druntime/src/ core/thread_helper and dll_helper. With the sys folder now established, I'd like to see them being moved into core/sys/windows and maybe just named thread and dll.
>
> Rainer
>
> Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Whoa... it's not important to know what version of dmd a user was running when encountering a bug?  I think it's critically important!

If someone submits a bug, and says "D2", and it's something that's already been fixed, you don't think it's worth knowing the version they used?  The next question is, "hm... I thought we fixed that, what version are you using?"  Lot's of time gets wasted when the version isn't specified.

-Steve



----- Original Message ----
> From: Don Clugston <dclugston at googlemail.com>
> To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
> Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 8:27:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [dmd-beta] dmd 1.062 and 2.047 beta
> 
> On 10 June 2010 14:19, Steve Schveighoffer <
> ymailto="mailto:schveiguy at yahoo.com"
> href="mailto:schveiguy at yahoo.com">schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> We
> are now coming up on 6 D2 and 5 D1 releases since you last updated bugzilla's
> version dropdown...

I wish we'd get rid of them entirely. They don't add
> any value at all.
The only thing that's relevant is D1 only, D2 only,
> D1+D2.
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing
> list

> href="mailto:dmd-beta at puremagic.com">dmd-beta at puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta