Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 08, 2013 [dmd-beta] Are we ready for 2.063.2? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Anything yet to be pulled or cherry-picked into the 2.063 branch?
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
|
June 09, 2013 Re: [dmd-beta] Are we ready for 2.063.2? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright Attachments:
| I pushed bug10299 fix to 2.063 branch. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/9069185a81e24a72699a5584632ca85b520319b1 AFAIK, in druntime and Phobos have no regression fixes that are not yet cherry-picked in 2.063 branch. Kenji Hara 2013/6/9 Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com> > Anything yet to be pulled or cherry-picked into the 2.063 branch? > ______________________________**_________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > dmd-beta@puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta> > |
June 08, 2013 Re: [dmd-beta] Are we ready for 2.063.2? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Well, there's still 4 open regressions. Assuming they apply to the 2.063 branch, they ought to be addressed. On 6/8/13 8:23 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > Anything yet to be pulled or cherry-picked into the 2.063 branch? > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > dmd-beta@puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
June 09, 2013 Re: [dmd-beta] Are we ready for 2.063.2? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts Attachments:
| 2013/6/9 Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> > Well, there's still 4 open regressions. Assuming they apply to the 2.063 branch, they ought to be addressed. I closed one already-fixed issue. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10299 Create a pull request for one. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10268 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1340 And, bug10215 is not a true compiler regression. It exists just only in the released package. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10215#c9 Then, I have no opinion about bug10255... http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10255 Kenji Hara |
June 09, 2013 Re: [dmd-beta] Are we ready for 2.063.2? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Brad Roberts | On 6/9/13, Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> wrote: > Well, there's still 4 open regressions. Assuming they apply to the 2.063 > branch, they ought to be > addressed. Here's a new 2.063 regression: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10317 _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
June 10, 2013 Re: [dmd-beta] Are we ready for 2.063.2? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Kenji Hara | On 6/8/2013 11:32 PM, Kenji Hara wrote: > > Then, I have no opinion about bug10255... > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10255 > Although I want to eventually get it fixed, it's not causing any problems. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation