On 01/13/2014 06:41 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> The only question I have is given the confusion around 2.065, I'd like to just reboot with 2.066 and go to beta.
Why? Simply deleting the tag and probably redoing branches would work too.
It only requires to hard sync the local git repositories. Only a small number of devs works with the 2.065 branches and we can easily post the correct git commands.
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 1/13/2014 2:31 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>
> On 01/13/2014 06:41 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> The only question I have is given the confusion around 2.065, I'd like to just reboot with 2.066 and go to beta.
> Why? Simply deleting the tag and probably redoing branches would work too.
> It only requires to hard sync the local git repositories. Only a small number of devs works with the 2.065 branches and we can easily post the correct git commands.

Looks like we're going that way.
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 1/13/14, 5:31 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>
> On 01/13/2014 06:41 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> The only question I have is given the confusion around 2.065, I'd like to just reboot with 2.066 and go to beta.
> Why? Simply deleting the tag and probably redoing branches would work too.
> It only requires to hard sync the local git repositories. Only a small number of devs works with the 2.065 branches and we can easily post the correct git commands.
>
@Martin, all outstanding pull requests for vagrant have been merged (thanks Walter). Are there any other issues blocking you progress on the automated build? I was not able to build create_dmd_release from your fork. See item number 4 at http://forum.dlang.org/post/52D3BACA.8080708@gmail.com. I vaguely remember there being a fix submitted for it some time ago but could not locate it. Anyway, we need to move forward with this so if there is something else blocking you please identify them.

Andrew
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 1/13/14, 5:04 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
> On 1/13/14, 12:41 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> The regression list is looking purty good now:
>>
>> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
>>
>>
>> The first 3 were there for 2.064, no change there.
>>
>> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 I suspect is not even a regression.
>>
>> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11896 should be fixed
>>
>> The only question I have is given the confusion around 2.065, I'd
>> like to just reboot with 2.066 and go to beta.
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta@puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
> Based on comments made thus far and the consensus reached, I will delete the 2.065 branch from all repos and recreate them. Before I do this however, Martin Nowak has several outstanding pull requests that require immediate attention:
>
Thanks for the swift response. I did some more scanning and came across these. They are also aimed at automating the build process and the 2.065 release. Extra vigilance int reviewing and merging them is appreciated.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/33 https://github.com/garethr/vagrantboxes-heroku/pull/246 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1806 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/698 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/32 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/30 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/29

Andrew

On 1/13/14, 5:04 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
> On 1/13/14, 12:41 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> The regression list is looking purty good now:
>>
>> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
>>
>>
>> The first 3 were there for 2.064, no change there.
>>
>> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 I suspect is not even a regression.
>>
>> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11896 should be fixed
>>
>> The only question I have is given the confusion around 2.065, I'd
>> like to just reboot with 2.066 and go to beta.
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta@puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
> Based on comments made thus far and the consensus reached, I will delete the 2.065 branch from all repos and recreate them. Before I do this however, Martin Nowak has several outstanding pull requests that require immediate attention:
[snip]
> [5] https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/35
>
[snip]

How do I get the following file uploaded to http://downloads.dlang.org/other/? It is required for pull request #35 which was merged earlier today.

     http://d.darktech.org/libcurl-7.34.0-WinSSL-zlib-x86-x64.zip

Thanks,
Andrew

Same here.

Andrei

On 1/12/14 9:48 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> I am strongly against skipping 2.065.  Just fix it and release it.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com
> <mailto:walter@digitalmars.com>> wrote:
>
>     The regression list is looking purty good now:
>
>     https://d.puremagic.com/__issues/buglist.cgi?query___format=advanced&bug_severity=__regression&bug_status=NEW&bug___status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=__REOPENED
>     <https://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED>
>
>     The first 3 were there for 2.064, no change there.
>
>     https://d.puremagic.com/__issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
>     <https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11543> I suspect is
>     not even a regression.
>
>     https://d.puremagic.com/__issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11896
>     <https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11896> should be fixed
>
>     The only question I have is given the confusion around 2.065, I'd
>     like to just reboot with 2.066 and go to beta.
>     _________________________________________________
>     dmd-beta mailing list
>     dmd-beta@puremagic.com <mailto:dmd-beta@puremagic.com>
>     http://lists.puremagic.com/__mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>     <http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

> It's a lot more work than to do a 2.066, which means it needs
> justification.

We'll learn how to rein in our release process better. This skip is in the same category as "my git repo got in an odd state, let me re-clone and cp stuff into it".

Andrei

_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 1/13/14 6:38 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
> How do I get the following file uploaded to http://downloads.dlang.org/other/? It is required for
> pull request #35 which was merged earlier today.
>
> http://d.darktech.org/libcurl-7.34.0-WinSSL-zlib-x86-x64.zip

Currently, you don't.  I do.  It's there now.

_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 13 jan 2014, at 11:07, Andrew Edwards <edwards.ac@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just tried building dmd on OSX and encountered a couple of problems:
> 
>    1. Running "make -f posix.mak install" on dmd errors out because the file ../ini/osx/bin64/dmd.conf does not exist. The issue is bin64 does not exist, it is simply bin. Either we need to rename the directory or modify the make file to skip model identification for osx. Offending line is 649 of posix.mak which reads "cp ../ini/$(OS)/bin$(MODEL)/dmd.conf $(INSTALL_DIR)/bin/dmd.conf".

The most appropriate solution is to modify the makefile. On Mac OS X only a 64bit binary (or universal binary) is released. Not need for having the model in the directory name.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

On 1/13/2014 10:23 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 13 jan 2014, at 11:07, Andrew Edwards <edwards.ac@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just tried building dmd on OSX and encountered a couple of problems:
>>
>>     1. Running "make -f posix.mak install" on dmd errors out because the file ../ini/osx/bin64/dmd.conf does not exist. The issue is bin64 does not exist, it is simply bin. Either we need to rename the directory or modify the make file to skip model identification for osx. Offending line is 649 of posix.mak which reads "cp ../ini/$(OS)/bin$(MODEL)/dmd.conf $(INSTALL_DIR)/bin/dmd.conf".
> The most appropriate solution is to modify the makefile. On Mac OS X only a 64bit binary (or universal binary) is released. Not need for having the model in the directory name.

Care to do the honors and fix posix.mak?
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
dmd-beta@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta