Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 05, 2010 [phobos] Is it time to release a beta? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
It's more than a week since bugfix week was announced. There have been ~ 50 commits to Phobos + druntime, and a huge number of important compiler bugs have been fixed, including the three most important regressions, and including patches by an unprecedented number of contributors. Is it time to prepare a release? Or is there something we still need to do? |
June 05, 2010 [phobos] Is it time to release a beta? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don Clugston | On 6/5/2010 12:03 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
> It's more than a week since bugfix week was announced. There have been
> ~ 50 commits to Phobos + druntime, and a huge number of important
> compiler bugs have been fixed, including the three most important
> regressions, and including patches by an unprecedented number of
> contributors.
> Is it time to prepare a release? Or is there something we still need to do?
I'd like to see 3516 fixed for the next release, but maybe that's being overly optimistic / aggressive. It's essentially saying "don't bother using dtors in structs" as long as that bug isn't fixed. Rather embarrassing.
We've got, what, a week give or take before TDPL hits people? So, this is the last release prior to that date.
My 2 cents,
Brad
|
June 05, 2010 [phobos] Is it time to release a beta? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Don Clugston | On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:03 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
> It's more than a week since bugfix week was announced. There have been
> ~ 50 commits to Phobos + druntime, and a huge number of important
> compiler bugs have been fixed, including the three most important
> regressions, and including patches by an unprecedented number of
> contributors.
> Is it time to prepare a release? Or is there something we still need to do?
I still have some changes to make in std.concurrency, but so long as they're picked up pre-release I'm fine with a beta now. There have been so many changes that this release may need a bit more review than some.
|
June 05, 2010 [phobos] Is it time to release a beta? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Sean Kelly | That's terrific, you all. I plan to check in std.container for this beta. Do we have a specific deadline?
FWIW, TDPL will start shipping out of InformIT in Indiana on Monday. So we should be in good shape on Wednesday.
Andrei
On 06/05/2010 08:46 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:03 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
>
>> It's more than a week since bugfix week was announced. There have been
>> ~ 50 commits to Phobos + druntime, and a huge number of important
>> compiler bugs have been fixed, including the three most important
>> regressions, and including patches by an unprecedented number of
>> contributors.
>> Is it time to prepare a release? Or is there something we still need to do?
>
> I still have some changes to make in std.concurrency, but so long as they're picked up pre-release I'm fine with a beta now. There have been so many changes that this release may need a bit more review than some.
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation