On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 21:49 -0300, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> What do I need to do to add std.log to the review queue? The implementation is feature complete and it should work in both Windows and Linux.

Since the TempAlloc review got cancelled/postponed, I suppose now is a good time to announce the review of std.log.  You need to find a review manager (any volunteers?), and that person should announce it in the newsgroup.  For past reviews we've set aside 3-4 weeks for the review and 1 week for voting.

(In case anyone is wondering what happened to std.path, which was supposed to be next in line:  I have recently gotten some very good suggestions from others, which in turn have spawned some new ideas of my own.  I simply haven't found the time to implement these things yet.  In the meantime I think we should just move on with std.log.)

-Lars

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <lars at kyllingen.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 21:49 -0300, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
> Since the TempAlloc review got cancelled/postponed, I suppose now is a
> good time to announce the review of std.log. ?You need to find a review
> manager (any volunteers?), and that person should announce it in the
> newsgroup. ?For past reviews we've set aside 3-4 weeks for the review
> and 1 week for voting.

Thanks! Unfortunately, I am going to be on the road for the next month so it is probably not a good time for me to submit std.log for review. I'll check in with this list when I am ready for the review process.