ping.

I've posted a bugzilla entry http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10177 and finally managed to reduce to a small test case.

So will the proposed method improve error reporting?
Is there any case where it might hurt?

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Timothee Cour <thelastmammoth@gmail.com>wrote:

> In a number of cases I get very large compile error messages after running rdmd main_module.d
>
> Upon inspection, running rdmd -v fun.d reveals that the irrelevant error messages are in different semantic3 passes:
>
> semantic3 module_with_relevant_error
> relevant error (eg: Error: no property 'x' for type 'y')
> semantic3 module_with_irrelevant_error
> irrelevant error (only coming from the fact that there was an error in a
> prior semantic pass)
> ...
> and the list goes on for large number of lines.
>
> Why not just start semantic3 passes at 1st error occurence ? or at least only show those by default?
>
> in all cases i've encountered all that was needed for me to see was the 1st faulty semantic3 pass, all other was irrelevant artifacts stemming from that.
>
>