One would hope so, but that's not necessarily the case esp. in unoptimized builds.

Anyway it's harder to write the wrapper than just declare an alias.

Sean

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:acuj6i$75r$2@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Sean L. Palmer" <seanpalmer@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:acu3qf$2fn4$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Can you alias a function declaration like that?  It'd be nice to be able
> to
> > provide an alternate name for a function.  I suppose one could always provide a simple wrapper but that'd lose performance.
>
> The simple wrapper won't lose performance because it gets inlined.