All four classes look quite similar, but DM only generates the same code for C and D. And I guess that the STLport library expects that all four cases are identical (and generate the same code as C and D).


struct A
{
  __declspec(dllimport) static int a;
};

int A::a;


struct B
{
  __declspec(dllimport) static int b;
};


struct C
{
  __declspec(dllimport) static int c;
};

__declspec(dllimport) int C::c;


struct D
{
  __declspec(dllimport) static int d;
};


int main()
{
  A a;
  B b;
  C c;
  D d;

  return a.a + b.b + c.c + d.d;
}


int B::b;


bye, Christof

-- 
http://cmeerw.org                                 JID: cmeerw@jabber.at mailto cmeerw at web.de

...and what have you contributed to the Net?

Fixed and posted as 8.29.20 beta. -Walter

"Christof Meerwald" <cmeerw@web.de> wrote in message news:ai4500$dfj$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> All four classes look quite similar, but DM only generates the same code
for
> C and D. And I guess that the STLport library expects that all four cases are identical (and generate the same code as C and D).
>
>
> struct A
> {
>   __declspec(dllimport) static int a;
> };
>
> int A::a;
>
>
> struct B
> {
>   __declspec(dllimport) static int b;
> };
>
>
> struct C
> {
>   __declspec(dllimport) static int c;
> };
>
> __declspec(dllimport) int C::c;
>
>
> struct D
> {
>   __declspec(dllimport) static int d;
> };
>
>
> int main()
> {
>   A a;
>   B b;
>   C c;
>   D d;
>
>   return a.a + b.b + c.c + d.d;
> }
>
>
> int B::b;
>
>
> bye, Christof
>
> --
> http://cmeerw.org                                 JID: cmeerw@jabber.at mailto cmeerw at web.de
>
> ...and what have you contributed to the Net?