Thread overview | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
November 12, 2002 unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hi, next problem. I have a win32 source code that uses the "getcwd" function. I only found this declaration in "unistd.h". 1. This include is not documented anywhere, right? Why? 2. I need to define M_UNIX or M_XENIX to get this file included. What is this? I found no documentation. I see that it's for unix stuff but DMC is a Win32 compiler. 3. When including "unistd.h" I get a lot of other errors I didn't got before. Is there a Win32 compliant definition for "getcwd"? -- Robert M. Münch IT & Management Freelancer Mobile: +49 (0)177 2452 802 Fax : +49 (0)721 8408 9112 Web : http://www.robertmuench.de |
November 12, 2002 Re: unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Robert M. Münch | There once was a unix version of DMC, but it fell by the wayside. getcwd() for win32 is in direct.h. -Walter "Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench@robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:aqqg9b$2lk5$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Hi, next problem. I have a win32 source code that uses the "getcwd" function. I only found this declaration in "unistd.h". > > 1. This include is not documented anywhere, right? Why? > > 2. I need to define M_UNIX or M_XENIX to get this file included. What is this? I found no documentation. I see that it's for unix stuff but DMC is a > Win32 compiler. > > 3. When including "unistd.h" I get a lot of other errors I didn't got before. Is there a Win32 compliant definition for "getcwd"? > > -- > Robert M. Münch > IT & Management Freelancer > Mobile: +49 (0)177 2452 802 > Fax : +49 (0)721 8408 9112 > Web : http://www.robertmuench.de > > |
November 13, 2002 Re: unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:aqrikl$mri$1@digitaldaemon.com... > There once was a unix version of DMC, but it fell by the wayside. Hi, well maybe we can see a Linux version one day... > getcwd() for win32 is in direct.h. -Walter Thanks. How about retering the "unistd.h" file and removing it from the distribution? Robert |
November 13, 2002 Re: unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Robert M. Münch | Yeah, it should go. "Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench@robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:aqt0v0$3134$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:aqrikl$mri$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > There once was a unix version of DMC, but it fell by the wayside. > > Hi, well maybe we can see a Linux version one day... > > > getcwd() for win32 is in direct.h. -Walter > > Thanks. How about retering the "unistd.h" file and removing it from the distribution? Robert > > |
November 13, 2002 Re: unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Robert M. Münch | A Linux DMC++ would be great. How much work is involved, Walter? "Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench@robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:aqt0v0$3134$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:aqrikl$mri$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > There once was a unix version of DMC, but it fell by the wayside. > > Hi, well maybe we can see a Linux version one day... > > > getcwd() for win32 is in direct.h. -Walter > > Thanks. How about retering the "unistd.h" file and removing it from the distribution? Robert > > |
November 14, 2002 Re: unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew Wilson | "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:aques1$2do1$1@digitaldaemon.com... > A Linux DMC++ would be great. > How much work is involved, Walter? One was built at one time, but there was insufficient interest in it. |
November 15, 2002 Re: unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Consider me interested in DMC++ for Linux. I want my programs be cross-platform DOSX/Win32/Linux, but I don't want to use another compiler for Linux. Nic Tiger. "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:ar0r1l$1tv4$2@digitaldaemon.com... > > "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:aques1$2do1$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > A Linux DMC++ would be great. > > How much work is involved, Walter? > > One was built at one time, but there was insufficient interest in it. > > |
February 24, 2003 Re: unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:ar0r1l$1tv4$2@digitaldaemon.com: > "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:aques1$2do1$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > A Linux DMC++ would be great. > > How much work is involved, Walter? > > One was built at one time, but there was insufficient interest in it. How you measured "sufficient" and "insufficient" ? Is that Linux version available on CD ? What is the speed of it. I consider DMC much better than Win32/DOS ports of GCC. If it can be also faster than GCC on its "native" Linux platform perhaps some advertisement could help ? ABX |
February 24, 2003 Re: unistd.h & getcwd | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to W³odzimierz Skiba | "W³odzimierz Skiba" <abx@abx.art.pl> wrote in message news:b3cmnu$23ma$1@digitaldaemon.com... > "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in news:ar0r1l$1tv4$2@digitaldaemon.com: > > "Matthew Wilson" <dmd@synesis.com.au> wrote in message news:aques1$2do1$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > > A Linux DMC++ would be great. > > > How much work is involved, Walter? > > One was built at one time, but there was insufficient interest in it. > How you measured "sufficient" and "insufficient" ? Is that Linux version available on CD ? What is the speed of it. I consider DMC much better than Win32/DOS ports of GCC. If it can be also faster than GCC on its "native" Linux platform perhaps some advertisement could help ? It's not available because it wasn't completed. It did generate faster code (about 10%) than the gcc of the time, though I'm told gcc has improved, but I'm skeptical. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation