Sigbjørn Lund Olsen wrote:
> 
>> I like "with". I go out of my way to use it. I'd use it for structs, too, if the compiler allowed it.
> 
> 
> Never used with. What's it for?

It facilitates referring to the same object repeatedly. I'll quote another's work to make my point:

[Without "with"]
  fileSelector = new Button (this)
  fileSelector.caption ("&File Selector");
  fileSelector.onClick.add (&fileSelectorClick);
  fileSelector.alignLeft (true);
  fileSelector.gridAddRow (0, r);
  fileSelector.sticky ("<>^");


[With "with"]
  with (fileSelector = new Button (this))
  {
     caption ("&File Selector");
     onClick.add (&fileSelectorClick);
     alignLeft (true);
     gridAddRow (0, r);
     sticky ("<>^");
  }


That explains it for me...

[...]
> Cheers,
> Sigbjørn Lund Olsen


-- 
Justin
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

Well, the conclusion is,

nothing good come out of this discussion.
Nobody agrees with me and you guys
now put me closer to the radial idiot mark :)

I guess I sound much smarter if I keep my
mounth close ;)

it's also interesting that nobody complains
on dig's API. It's so strange! probably it's
a windows thing and I'm just not used to it.

Ant