Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP?  I recently switched from Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly.  It seems like the trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc).  I've tried all the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no theming) and it doesn't seem to help.  It's really annoying that my p133 runs this thing faster than my athlon 1700.

No problems on Intel 2GHz XP

"Jon Allen" <jallen@minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b62nr9$1io6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP?  I recently switched from Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly.  It seems like
the
> trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc).  I've tried
all
> the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no theming)
and
> it doesn't seem to help.  It's really annoying that my p133 runs this
thing
> faster than my athlon 1700.
>
>

"Jon Allen" <jallen@minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b62nr9$1io6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP?  I recently switched from Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly.  It seems like
the
> trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc).  I've tried
all
> the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no theming)
and
> it doesn't seem to help.  It's really annoying that my p133 runs this
thing
> faster than my athlon 1700.

slashdot is running a story about Windows XP SP1 running apps 10 times slower. Perhaps that's related? http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/28/2220247.shtml?tid=201

nope, don't have sp1, a friend told me it made his system flaky so i didn't
bother :-)
"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:b64mk1$1hs$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Jon Allen" <jallen@minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b62nr9$1io6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP?  I recently switched
from
> > Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly.  It seems like
> the
> > trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc).  I've tried
> all
> > the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no theming)
> and
> > it doesn't seem to help.  It's really annoying that my p133 runs this
> thing
> > faster than my athlon 1700.
>
> slashdot is running a story about Windows XP SP1 running apps 10 times slower. Perhaps that's related? http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/28/2220247.shtml?tid=201
>
>

Much less flaky, IME

"Jon Allen" <jallen@minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b6a9dp$10vb$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> nope, don't have sp1, a friend told me it made his system flaky so i
didn't
> bother :-)
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
> news:b64mk1$1hs$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >
> > "Jon Allen" <jallen@minotstateu.edu> wrote in message news:b62nr9$1io6$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > Has anyone had any trouble with the IDDE in XP?  I recently switched
> from
> > > Win2k to WinXP and now the IDDE runs unacceptably slowly.  It seems
like
> > the
> > > trouble is coming from disk access (saving, compiling, etc).  I've
tried
> > all
> > > the little compatibility options (Win95, Win98/ME, Win2000, no
theming)
> > and
> > > it doesn't seem to help.  It's really annoying that my p133 runs this
> > thing
> > > faster than my athlon 1700.
> >
> > slashdot is running a story about Windows XP SP1 running apps 10 times slower. Perhaps that's related? http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/28/2220247.shtml?tid=201
> >
> >
>
>