Jump to page: 1 2 3
Thread overview
DM C/C++ 8.35 release
Aug 23, 2003
Walter
Aug 24, 2003
Matthew Wilson
Aug 24, 2003
Walter
Aug 25, 2003
Greg Peet
Aug 25, 2003
Greg Peet
Aug 25, 2003
Walter
Aug 25, 2003
Cesar Rabak
Aug 25, 2003
Walter
Aug 26, 2003
Cesar Rabak
Aug 26, 2003
Walter
Aug 26, 2003
Cesar Rabak
Aug 26, 2003
Greg Peet
Aug 26, 2003
Cesar Rabak
Aug 26, 2003
Greg Peet
Aug 30, 2003
Cesar Rabak
Aug 25, 2003
chris elliott
Aug 25, 2003
Arjan Knepper
Aug 25, 2003
Walter
Aug 26, 2003
chris elliott
Aug 30, 2003
Sergey Gutnikov
Aug 31, 2003
Walter
Aug 31, 2003
Walter
Aug 31, 2003
Craig Bowlas
August 23, 2003
An accummulation of a lot of minor fixes. Now has STLSoft 1.6.5.

http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm



August 24, 2003
Excuse please, as may have jettisoned an important part of the brain as a result of all that late night testing of 8.35b, but ...

   Where do I get the latest DMC++ MFC?

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bi8tir$loe$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> An accummulation of a lot of minor fixes. Now has STLSoft 1.6.5.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm
>
>
>


August 24, 2003
It comes on the CD. If you have an older CD, and install the CD updates in order, you should wind up with the latest.

>    Where do I get the latest DMC++ MFC?


August 25, 2003
I think he means where's the upgrade for the CD:
http://www.digitalmars.com/download/freecompiler.html
The upgrade for CD owners is at the bottom.

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:bi9cma$1aen$1@digitaldaemon.com...
| It comes on the CD. If you have an older CD, and install the CD updates in
| order, you should wind up with the latest.
|
| >    Where do I get the latest DMC++ MFC?
|
|


August 25, 2003
Hi Walter,
    You mention rebuilding STLport though I get a clean return on smake -f
dm.mak (meaning there is nothing to be built).
Where there any changes made to STLport since 8.34? Or am I a fool and need
to remove all the lib's and dll's and just rebuild? =)

Thanks

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:bi8tir$loe$1@digitaldaemon.com...
| An accummulation of a lot of minor fixes. Now has STLSoft 1.6.5.
|
| http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm
|
|
|


August 25, 2003
>     You mention rebuilding STLport though I get a clean return on smake -f
> dm.mak (meaning there is nothing to be built).
> Where there any changes made to STLport since 8.34? Or am I a fool and
need
> to remove all the lib's and dll's and just rebuild? =)

No source changes made. I rebuilt it just to ensure that 8.35 could <g>.


August 25, 2003
this release still has a bug compiling current wxWindows source (it was ok in 8.34)

dmc -c -cpp -Ae -Ar -mn -D_WINDOWS -6 -a8 -Nc -c -H -HD..\..\d_mars -HO- -DWXMSW
 -D__WIN32__ -D__WIN95__ -D__WXDEBUG__  -I..\..\include -I..\..\lib\_sc -I..\..\
contrib\include -I..\../src/regex;..\../src/png;..\../src/jpeg;..\../src/zlib;..
\../src/tiff  ..\..\src\generic\gridsel.cpp -o..\..\src\generic\gridsel.obj
Internal error: type 355
--- errorlevel 1


D:\wx\wxWindows\src\msw>scppn
Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler Version 8.35.10n
Copyright (C) Digital Mars 2000-2003.  All Rights Reserved.
Written by Walter Bright
www.digitalmars.com

chris

Walter wrote:
> An accummulation of a lot of minor fixes. Now has STLSoft 1.6.5.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm
> 
> 
> 

August 25, 2003
Walter escreveu:
>> You mention rebuilding STLport though I get a clean return on smake
>> -f dm.mak (meaning there is nothing to be built). Where there any
>> changes made to STLport since 8.34? Or am I a fool and
>
> need
>
>> to remove all the lib's and dll's and just rebuild? =)
>
>
> No source changes made. I rebuilt it just to ensure that 8.35 could
> <g>.
>
Interestingly, after I applied the CD upgrade, when I try to compile the
hello.cpp STLPort example I get an error I did not used to get:

C:\DM\stlport>sc hello -I\dm\stlport\stlport
link hello,,,user32+kernel32/noi;
OPTLINK (R) for Win32  Release 7.50B1
Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989 - 2001  All Rights Reserved

C:\DM\BIN\..\lib\SNN.lib(except)  Offset 06F3FH Record Type 00C3
 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : ??1exception@std@@UAE@XZ (syscall std:
:exception::~exception(void ))
C:\DM\BIN\..\lib\SNN.lib(except)  Offset 0703AH Record Type 00C3
 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : ?what@exception@std@@UBEPBDXZ (char co
nst *syscall std::exception::what(void )const )
C:\DM\BIN\..\lib\SNN.lib(except)  Offset 07131H Record Type 00C3
 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : ??1bad_exception@std@@UAE@XZ (syscall
std::bad_exception::~bad_exception(void ))
C:\DM\BIN\..\lib\SNN.lib(except)  Offset 071EFH Record Type 00C3
 Error 1: Previous Definition Different : ?what@bad_exception@std@@UBEPBDXZ (cha
r const *syscall std::bad_exception::what(void )const )

--- errorlevel 4

Perhaps I have to recompile some library?

-- 
Cesar Rabak
GNU/Linux User 52247.
Get counted: http://counter.li.org/

August 25, 2003
Walter,

Any suggestions how to isolate such errors?

I have isolated two identical blocks of code in two separated member functions causing this error, but tearing it apart into a new file, makes the error disappear.

The strange thing is when I comment the first code block out the error 355 still occurs in the second code block, but changing the first code block a little makes also the error disappear for the _unmodified_ second block of code.

attached the file.

p.s. This file could also be used as work around for DMC 8.35 and wxWindows-2.4.1 and the current cvs.


Arjan

chris elliott wrote:

> this release still has a bug compiling current wxWindows source (it was ok in 8.34)
> 
> dmc -c -cpp -Ae -Ar -mn -D_WINDOWS -6 -a8 -Nc -c -H -HD..\..\d_mars -HO-
> -DWXMSW
>  -D__WIN32__ -D__WIN95__ -D__WXDEBUG__  -I..\..\include -I..\..\lib\_sc
> -I..\..\
> contrib\include
> -I..\../src/regex;..\../src/png;..\../src/jpeg;..\../src/zlib;..
> \../src/tiff  ..\..\src\generic\gridsel.cpp -o..\..\src\generic\gridsel.obj
> Internal error: type 355
> --- errorlevel 1
> 
> 
> D:\wx\wxWindows\src\msw>scppn
> Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler Version 8.35.10n
> Copyright (C) Digital Mars 2000-2003.  All Rights Reserved.
> Written by Walter Bright
> www.digitalmars.com
> 
> chris
> 
> Walter wrote:
> 
>> An accummulation of a lot of minor fixes. Now has STLSoft 1.6.5.
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/compiler.htm
>>
>>
>>
> 


August 25, 2003
Email me the source to your hello.cpp.

"Cesar Rabak" <csrabak@uol.com.br> wrote in message news:3F4A468A.2080303@uol.com.br...
> Walter escreveu:
>  >> You mention rebuilding STLport though I get a clean return on smake
>  >> -f dm.mak (meaning there is nothing to be built). Where there any
>  >> changes made to STLport since 8.34? Or am I a fool and
>  >
>  > need
>  >
>  >> to remove all the lib's and dll's and just rebuild? =)
>  >
>  >
>  > No source changes made. I rebuilt it just to ensure that 8.35 could
>  > <g>.
>  >
> Interestingly, after I applied the CD upgrade, when I try to compile the
> hello.cpp STLPort example I get an error I did not used to get:
>
> C:\DM\stlport>sc hello -I\dm\stlport\stlport
> link hello,,,user32+kernel32/noi;
> OPTLINK (R) for Win32  Release 7.50B1
> Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989 - 2001  All Rights Reserved
>
> C:\DM\BIN\..\lib\SNN.lib(except)  Offset 06F3FH Record Type 00C3
>   Error 1: Previous Definition Different : ??1exception@std@@UAE@XZ
> (syscall std:
> :exception::~exception(void ))
> C:\DM\BIN\..\lib\SNN.lib(except)  Offset 0703AH Record Type 00C3
>   Error 1: Previous Definition Different : ?what@exception@std@@UBEPBDXZ
> (char co
> nst *syscall std::exception::what(void )const )
> C:\DM\BIN\..\lib\SNN.lib(except)  Offset 07131H Record Type 00C3
>   Error 1: Previous Definition Different : ??1bad_exception@std@@UAE@XZ
> (syscall
> std::bad_exception::~bad_exception(void ))
> C:\DM\BIN\..\lib\SNN.lib(except)  Offset 071EFH Record Type 00C3
>   Error 1: Previous Definition Different :
> ?what@bad_exception@std@@UBEPBDXZ (cha
> r const *syscall std::bad_exception::what(void )const )
>
> --- errorlevel 4
>
> Perhaps I have to recompile some library?
>
> --
> Cesar Rabak
> GNU/Linux User 52247.
> Get counted: http://counter.li.org/
>


« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3