https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10979

mhh <maxhaton@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |maxhaton@gmail.com
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #6 from mhh <maxhaton@gmail.com> ---
keep an eye out for typefunctions (to anyone reading this for some reason)

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10979

--- Comment #7 from Adam D. Ruppe <destructionator@gmail.com> ---
Type functions aren't a substitute for this at all. Even if you had them, they'd still need a way to introspect the function's calls which is what this enhancement is requesting.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10979

Boris Carvajal <boris2.9@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |boris2.9@gmail.com
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---

--- Comment #8 from Boris Carvajal <boris2.9@gmail.com> ---
Reopening. There is no reason to close it.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10979

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P2                          |P4

--