| Thread overview | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 17, 2016 [Issue 16181] Overloading doesn't consider default arguments with regards to ambiguity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16181 Danila Letunovskiy <kapblc@mail.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kapblc@mail.ru --- Comment #1 from Danila Letunovskiy <kapblc@mail.ru> --- And this Error int foo(int a, int b=2){ return a + b; } int foo(float a){ return a; } void main() { writeln( foo(12) ); } -- | ||||
May 10, 2020 [Issue 16181] Overloading doesn't consider default arguments with regards to ambiguity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16181 Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |pull --- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> --- @Luhrel created dlang/dmd pull request #11127 "Fix Issue 16181 - Overloading doesn't consider default arguments with…" fixing this issue: - Fix Issue 16181 - Overloading doesn't consider default arguments with regards to ambiguity https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11127 -- | ||||
May 11, 2020 [Issue 16181] Overloading doesn't consider default arguments with regards to ambiguity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16181 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |bugzilla@digitalmars.com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> --- The default argument is treated as an argument. While both functions match, then the "least as specialized" rule is applied: foo(a) can call foo(int a, int b = 2) foo(a, 2) cannot call foo(int a) Therefore, foo(int a) is selected. Not a bug. -- | ||||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply