https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

Sky Thirteenth <sky.13th.95@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sky.13th.95@gmail.com

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

Sky Thirteenth <sky.13th.95@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|sky.13th.95@gmail.com       |

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

Sky Thirteenth <sky.13th.95@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |major

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

b2.temp@gmx.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Hardware|x86_64                      |All
                 OS|Windows                     |All

--- Comment #1 from b2.temp@gmx.com ---
1. I don't see the first function working. (https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/2b462faf70b0). WHen you try to instantiate both gives the same error.

2. If you don't do partial instantiation then your alias can be declared more simply as 'alias TestAlias = TestType;'

3. The real problem you encounter here is that TestType template argument cannot be deduced from the value passed to the constructor:

    struct TestType(T)
    {
        T data;
    }

    void main()
    {
        auto a = TestType(0); // same error
    }

This is exactly what happens when you call TestFunctionA. For example you can replace the declaration by:

    void testFunctionB(T)(T arg)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

b2.temp@gmx.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from b2.temp@gmx.com ---
This is not a bug, this is issue 6082. IFTI doesn't support this yet.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6082 ***

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

--- Comment #3 from Sky Thirteenth <sky.13th.95@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to b2.temp from comment #2)
> This is not a bug, this is issue 6082. IFTI doesn't support this yet.
> 
> *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6082 ***

Sorry, but not we have some misunderstanding.

Question is not about a constructors. It about a types.

Here is more clear example: https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/2c8e1c350182

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

Sky Thirteenth <sky.13th.95@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |---

--- Comment #4 from Sky Thirteenth <sky.13th.95@gmail.com> ---

(In addition to Sky Thirteenth from comment #3)
> (In reply to b2.temp from comment #2)
> > This is not a bug, this is issue 6082. IFTI doesn't support this yet.
> > 
> > *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6082 ***
> 
> Sorry, but not we have some misunderstanding.
> 
> Question is not about a constructors. It about a types.
> 
> Here is more clear example: https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/2c8e1c350182

Template aliases does not work correct while it used with template functions. Compiler just somehow can't understand that is the same type, rather than different.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

--- Comment #5 from b2.temp@gmx.com ---
I confirm the misunderstanding. If you permit I would suggest you to close this one but to open a new issue using your second example. The first one really represented issue 6082. The second is perfectly clear.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

--- Comment #6 from Sky Thirteenth <sky.13th.95@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to b2.temp from comment #5)
> I confirm the misunderstanding. If you permit I would suggest you to close this one but to open a new issue using your second example. The first one really represented issue 6082. The second is perfectly clear.

Yes, sure.
But, you will create new one, or should I?

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16465

--- Comment #7 from b2.temp@gmx.com ---
(In reply to Sky Thirteenth from comment #6)
> (In reply to b2.temp from comment #5)
> > I confirm the misunderstanding. If you permit I would suggest you to close this one but to open a new issue using your second example. The first one really represented issue 6082. The second is perfectly clear.
> 
> Yes, sure.
> But, you will create new one, or should I?

I wont, you will.

--