| Thread overview | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 17, 2017 [Issue 17505] [REG2.075] @safe constructor requires the deconstructor to be safe as well | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P1 |P3 CC| |code@dawg.eu --- Comment #1 from Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> --- Introduced by https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6816 Also manifestates in libasync https://github.com/etcimon/libasync/blob/a56cf33720731de717ef5d6c5f1c0d51341da145/source/libasync/events.d#L57. ---- source/libasync/events.d(57,2): Error: destructor 'libasync.events.EventLoop.~this' is not nothrow source/libasync/events.d(57,2): Error: nothrow constructor 'libasync.events.EventLoop.this' may throw ---- -- | ||||
June 17, 2017 [Issue 17505] [REG2.075] @safe constructor requires the deconstructor to be safe as well | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greeenify@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> --- FYI have you seen Cybershadow's comment? https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6816#issuecomment-307657520 And his reduced test case for the regression in libasync? struct S { ~this() {} } class C { S s; this() nothrow {} } -- | ||||
June 17, 2017 [Issue 17505] [REG2.075] @safe constructor requires the deconstructor to be safe as well | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 --- Comment #3 from Martin Nowak <code@dawg.eu> --- (In reply to greenify from comment #2) > FYI have you seen Cybershadow's comment? https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6816#issuecomment-307657520 Ah thanks, libasync is a duplicate of issue 17494, does have the nothrow, not the `@safe` issue. -- | ||||
June 17, 2017 [Issue 17505] [REG2.075] @safe constructor requires the deconstructor to be safe as well | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzilla@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/558773e64d42d56ad02970adfdc1371311ca3291 add test cases for existing production code - fixes Issues 17494, 17505, 17506 -- | ||||
June 17, 2017 [Issue 17505] [REG2.075] @safe constructor requires the deconstructor to be safe as well | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 github-bugzilla@puremagic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- | ||||
August 07, 2017 [Issue 17505] [REG2.075] @safe constructor requires the deconstructor to be safe as well | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzilla@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to newCTFE at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/558773e64d42d56ad02970adfdc1371311ca3291 add test cases for existing production code -- | ||||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply