https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17643

RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
Could you pinpoint the exact location of the example? I can't find it in std/traits.d

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17643

--- Comment #2 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
Anyway, this probably is the correct behaviour.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17643

--- Comment #3 from greenify <greeenify@gmail.com> ---
See https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5607

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17643

Vladimir Panteleev <dlang-bugzilla@thecybershadow.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |regression

--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Panteleev <dlang-bugzilla@thecybershadow.net> ---
- Started working with https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/3827, which allowed
getSymbolsByUDA to work on private members
- https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/5530 caused accessing the field result in a
deprecation, but it still worked (and returned both members)
- https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/5344 has broken this completely.

This certainly seems like a regression, but I'm not sure I can put the blame entirely on either of those PRs.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17643

Mitu <the.mail.of.mi2@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |the.mail.of.mi2@gmail.com
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from Mitu <the.mail.of.mi2@gmail.com> ---
It duplicates the #15335, which - despite the merged PR - still persists or have been revived.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 15335 ***

--