| Thread overview | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 15, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 Carsten Blüggel <chilli@posteo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |18445 Referenced Issues: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18445 [Issue 18445] [DIP25] Unreproducible/wrong "return as a parameter attribute" inference -- | |||
Permalink
ReplyFebruary 15, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 Carsten Blüggel <chilli@posteo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chilli@posteo.net -- | |||
March 03, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla@digitalmars.com --- Comment #1 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> --- I've been going through and tagging the relevant issues with the keyword 'safe'. -- | |||
March 16, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 Issue 18444 depends on issue 17512, which changed state. Issue 17512 Summary: [REG 2.073] [DIP1000] Error on bad interplay of 'auto ref' and 'return' attribute deduction. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- | |||
March 16, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 Carsten Blüggel <chilli@posteo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |18478 Referenced Issues: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18478 [Issue 18478] Spurious "escapes a reference to local variable" error in function that does not return by reference -- | |||
March 19, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 Carsten Blüggel <chilli@posteo.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|18445 | Referenced Issues: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18445 [Issue 18445] [DIP25][DIP1000] Wrong "return as a parameter attribute" inference -- | |||
March 20, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> --- Is there any reason not to close this? The `safe` keyword does the job to connect these related issues. -- | |||
March 20, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 Issue 18444 depends on issue 18478, which changed state. Issue 18478 Summary: Spurious "escapes a reference to local variable" error in function that does not return by reference https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18478 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID -- | |||
March 20, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 --- Comment #3 from Carsten Blüggel <chilli@posteo.net> --- (In reply to Walter Bright from comment #2) > Is there any reason not to close this? The `safe` keyword does the job to connect these related issues. Thank You so much for working hard on D and I'm especially delighted at Your recent work on my "favorite" subject, scope/dip1000/safe, finalizing that. I used this issue for pointing to "blocking -dip1000 compilable phobos" issues. If it's of no special value for You, then it's worth to be/remain RESOLVED. My vision is, phobos to be fully -dip1000 compilable before DConf2018 and Seb and others are great in going this same direction. -- | |||
March 21, 2018 [Issue 18444] [DIP25][DIP1000] Tracking issue for: "The implementation doesn't match DIPs 25/1000" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18444 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> --- (In reply to Carsten Blüggel from comment #3) > If it's of no special value for You, then it's worth to be/remain RESOLVED. My vision is, phobos to be fully -dip1000 compilable before DConf2018 and Seb and others are great in going this same direction. I agree with your agenda of making phobos fully -dip1000 by DConf. I'm glad you're focusing on that, enabling me to focus on making the compiler -dip1000 correct, as doing that gives a solid foundation for your goal. -- | |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation