https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326

Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |doob@me.com

--- Comment #1 from Jacob Carlborg <doob@me.com> ---
I don't consider this a bug, I consider this a feature.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326

Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |accepts-invalid, safe
                 CC|                            |peter.alexander.au@gmail.co
                   |                            |m

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326

Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugzilla@digitalmars.com
           See Also|                            |https://issues.dlang.org/sh
                   |                            |ow_bug.cgi?id=15371

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326

--- Comment #2 from Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> ---
tupleof is known to break through private access protections. It should probably not be allowed in @safe code.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326

Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|accepts-invalid             |spec

--- Comment #3 from Peter Alexander <peter.alexander.au@gmail.com> ---
It probably goes without saying, but many parts of Phobos use tupleof, so a generously sprinkling of @trusted would be needed. Likely this will break much 3rd party code although that is pure speculation on my part.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P2

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19326

RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
It seems that now `__traits(getMember, s, "i")++;` also compiles. Does that mean that tupleof is also allowed or should we change this?

--