https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21189

RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from RazvanN <razvan.nitu1305@gmail.com> ---
Yeah, my bad. The DIPS specifically says that a struct that defines a copy constructor is not POD [1], however that did not make it in the spec.

[1] https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/129/files#diff-ecee0474c4314cd47dd8c2656b485c0cfd56e704a85de75839ec2850fb61f0ebR585

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21189

Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |pull

--- Comment #2 from Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> ---
@RazvanN7 created dlang/dlang.org pull request #2876 "Fix Issue 21189 - Plain Old Data and copy constructors" fixing this issue:

- Fix Issue 21189 - Plain Old Data and copy constructors

https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/2876

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21189

Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Dlang Bot <dlang-bot@dlang.rocks> ---
dlang/dlang.org pull request #2876 "Fix Issue 21189 - Plain Old Data and copy constructors" was merged into master:

- 4655c57580dbe404c2f50584d38fe0d6d0ce3bb5 by Razvan Nitu:
  Fix Issue 21189 - Plain Old Data and copy constructors

https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/2876

--