[Issue 24866] Inconsistent behavior in safe checking of conversion to void

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24866 Walter Bright <bugzilla@digitalmars.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |safe --

3 days ago

Posted by Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole

Permalink

Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole

Permalink

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24866

Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole <alphaglosined@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alphaglosined@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole <alphaglosined@gmail.com> ---
Due to placement new, I'm on the side of disallowing conversion to ``void*`` and ``void[]`` in ``@safe``.

We have been relying on a language feature like that not existing and it opens up a major can of worms to have it.

Related: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24772

--

Forums