Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 07, 2010 [Issue 4836] New: "duplicated union initialization" without a union | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4836 Summary: "duplicated union initialization" without a union Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: i.kasiuk@gmx.de --- Comment #0 from Ivo Kasiuk <i.kasiuk@gmx.de> 2010-09-07 12:49:28 PDT --- The following compilation error does not seem to make sense: $ cat test.d class C { string s = null; mixin template M() { } mixin M!() m1; // line 4 mixin template M(T) { } // line 5 mixin M!(int) m2; } $ dmd -c test test.d(1): Error: class test.C duplicated union initialization for s $ Interestingly, the file compiles without error if line 4 and 5 are swapped. Tested with DMD v2.048 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
September 08, 2010 [Issue 4836] "duplicated union initialization" without a union | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ivo Kasiuk | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4836 --- Comment #1 from Ivo Kasiuk <i.kasiuk@gmx.de> 2010-09-08 11:06:48 PDT --- Also, line 6 seems to have no influence, so the following still does not compile: class C { string s = null; mixin template M() { } mixin M!() m1; mixin template M(T) { } } On the other hand, when replacing "string s = null" by "int i = 0" it compiles without error. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
February 06, 2011 [Issue 4836] "duplicated union initialization" without a union | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ivo Kasiuk | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4836 Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|x86_64 |x86 --- Comment #2 from Brad Roberts <braddr@puremagic.com> 2011-02-06 15:40:17 PST --- Mass migration of bugs marked as x86-64 to just x86. The platform run on isn't what's relevant, it's if the app is a 32 or 64 bit app. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
January 06, 2012 [Issue 4836] "duplicated union initialization" without a union | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ivo Kasiuk | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4836 Trass3r <mrmocool@gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |mrmocool@gmx.de Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Trass3r <mrmocool@gmx.de> 2012-01-06 06:09:18 PST --- Compiles now. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation