http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6146

           Summary: A way to mark a static construct as having no
                    dependencies
           Product: D
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: DMD
        AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com
        ReportedBy: jmdavisProg@gmx.com


--- Comment #0 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> 2011-06-11 00:19:12 PDT ---
It would really help in dealing with circular dependencies between modules if it were possible to mark a static constructor as not having any dependencies. It's often the case, and it's a royal pain to get rid of a circular dependency once the compiler (or is it druntime?) decides that you have one. If you have a true circular dependency, then you need to redesign things, but if you don't, then the current status of things is _very_ annoying.

It seems to me that it could be as simple as adding a new attribute (e.g. @nodeps) which only applied to static constructors and then that static constructor is then ignored in the tests for circular dependencies. I don't know how much work it would be to effect such a change, but it at least seems like it would be a fairly small change, and it would have major benefits. It's incredibly easy to get a circular dependency once you start using many static constructors, and the vast majority of the time there isn't really a dependency. So, having a means to indicate that a static constructor has no external dependencies would help a lot.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6146


Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg@gmx.com> 2012-01-20 23:17:21 PST ---
I'd love to have something like this, but Walter is completely against it, so it's never going to happen.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------