Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
November 07, 2011 [Issue 6903] New: Auto Return Doesn't Work With Nested Functions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6903 Summary: Auto Return Doesn't Work With Nested Functions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nobody@puremagic.com ReportedBy: dsimcha@yahoo.com --- Comment #0 from David Simcha <dsimcha@yahoo.com> 2011-11-07 08:38:26 PST --- This may technically be an enhancement request, but it seems like a massive, glaring inconsistency for no good reason, so I consider it a bug. void main() { auto foo() { return 3; } } test.d(2): function declaration without return type. (Note that constructors are always named 'this') test.d(2): no identifier for declarator foo() -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
November 07, 2011 [Issue 6903] Auto Return Doesn't Work With Nested Functions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Simcha | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6903 bearophile_hugs@eml.cc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bearophile_hugs@eml.cc --- Comment #1 from bearophile_hugs@eml.cc 2011-11-07 09:34:33 PST --- See bug 4401 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
November 07, 2011 [Issue 6903] Auto Return Doesn't Work With Nested Functions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Simcha | http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6903 Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara <k.hara.pg@gmail.com> 2011-11-07 09:54:21 PST --- This is parser problem, and there is no reason to reject it from dmd internally (e.g. The return type of function literal is almost inferred). *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4401 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation