Walter wrote:

> "Roel Mathys" <roel.mathys@yucom.be> wrote in message
> news:buvsk3$1fii$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> 
>>On the default arguments issue: will there be in the future support for
>>default parameters in templates and/or functions.
> 
> 
> It isn't really necessary, since D supports function overloading and class
> template overloading.
> 
> 

yes, simply forwarding an overloaded (simpler) version to a more complicated version with the default argument(s) filled in will do.

it's a matter of making a choice, and that's up to you, I believe :-)

bye,
roel