February 16, 2004 Re: [Language design] yet another notational error | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Derek Parnell | On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:55:03 +1100, Derek Parnell <Derek.Parnell@No.Spam> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 04:30:07 GMT (02/16/04 15:30:07)
> , Karl Bochert <kbochert@copper.net> wrote:
>
> > An obvious help (for Windows, at least) is to use a font designed for
> > programming.
> > See
> > www.catexa.com
> > for a mono-spaced font similar to courier that distinguishes 1, l, 0 O
> > It also has outsize punctuation so that perios, colons, braces etc. are
> > visible
> >
>
> Pity that catexa's been hacked though.
>
>
> --
> Derek
Thanks for the info -- its been fixed.
Apparently the Ivision BB has a leak, and I had used identical
passwords for it and my site.
Live long and learn little
Karl Bochert
|
February 25, 2004 Re: [Language design] yet another notational error | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Manfred Nowak | I've changed the language so that floating point values are no longer implicitly converted to integral types. "Manfred Nowak" <svv1999@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c0bb5v$238e$1@digitaldaemon.com... > void main() > { > char[4] foo= "1234"; > char[] bar; > > bar.length= 5; > bar[0..2]= foo[1.3]; > printf("%.*s\n", bar); > } > > Would you also recognize it in millions of lines of code? > > So long. |
March 09, 2004 Re: [Language design] reply part 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to davepermen | davepermen wrote:
[...]
> my argument against this is just one:
> syntax highlighting only highlights correct code properly. incorrect code
> gets quickly visible.
Meanwhile Walter has decided to disallow implicit conversion from floatings to integers. Promptly two messages appeared, that such conversions were detected. For me an indication, that at least the used syntax highlighting was not able to prevent a possible desaster.
So long.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation