Thread overview | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 15, 2004 gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it really is a gnu port of the dmd source. Anyhow, post if you have comments. -Ben |
February 15, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ben Hinkle | Ben Hinkle wrote:
> I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there
> are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One
> reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it
> really is a gnu port of the dmd source.
> Anyhow, post if you have comments.
> -Ben
dindm is not digital mars.
*shudder*
-- andy
|
February 15, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ben Hinkle | I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas based on the naming of other GCC frontends: GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) GCD - GNU Compiler for D DCC - D Compiler Collection Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC. Many UNIX systems define the system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler). Hence the system D compiler should be DC. GCC is the GNU C Compiler (Well, it was originally. It's now far more than that.) Hence the GNU version of DC should be GDC. Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference. Owen In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says... > >I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there >are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One >reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it >really is a gnu port of the dmd source. >Anyhow, post if you have comments. >-Ben > > |
February 15, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to resistor | On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:42:18 +0000, resisto wrote:
> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas
> based on the naming of
> other GCC frontends:
>
> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler)
> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC)
> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2)
> GCD - GNU Compiler for D
> DCC - D Compiler Collection
>
I think DGCC is a good logical start. GCD is actually funny if you think of it. DCC is not really accurate (it's not really a D compiler collection).
Just an opinion. Great work!
John R.
|
February 15, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to resistor | what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually. GDC gets my vote. C <resistor@mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oi2q$23og$1@digitaldaemon.com... > I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas > based on the naming of > other GCC frontends: > > GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) > DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) > GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) > GCD - GNU Compiler for D > DCC - D Compiler Collection > > Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC. Many > UNIX systems define the > system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler). Hence the system D compiler should be > DC. GCC is the GNU > C Compiler (Well, it was originally. It's now far more than that.) Hence the > GNU version of DC should > be GDC. > > Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference. > > Owen > > In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says... > > > >I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there > >are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One > >reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it > >really is a gnu port of the dmd source. > >Anyhow, post if you have comments. > >-Ben > > > > > > |
February 15, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to C | G77 is so named because it compiles Fortran-77. Please, let's not get into naming it like Windows versions! Owen In article <c0oou4$2edt$1@digitaldaemon.com>, C says... > >what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually. GDC gets my vote. > >C ><resistor@mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oi2q$23og$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other >ideas >> based on the naming of >> other GCC frontends: >> >> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) >> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) >> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) >> GCD - GNU Compiler for D >> DCC - D Compiler Collection >> >> Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC. >Many >> UNIX systems define the >> system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler). Hence the system D compiler >should be >> DC. GCC is the GNU >> C Compiler (Well, it was originally. It's now far more than that.) Hence >the >> GNU version of DC should >> be GDC. >> >> Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference. >> >> Owen >> >> In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says... >> > >> >I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if >there >> >are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. >One >> >reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source >so it >> >really is a gnu port of the dmd source. >> >Anyhow, post if you have comments. >> >-Ben >> > >> > >> >> > > |
February 15, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to resistor | Hehe, I was refering to the 2004 1.0 standard , but its no good anyway. Charlie <resistor@mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oqkm$2h6n$1@digitaldaemon.com... > G77 is so named because it compiles Fortran-77. Please, let's not get into > naming it like Windows > versions! > > Owen > > In article <c0oou4$2edt$1@digitaldaemon.com>, C says... > > > >what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually. GDC gets my vote. > > > >C > ><resistor@mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oi2q$23og$1@digitaldaemon.com... > >> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other > >ideas > >> based on the naming of > >> other GCC frontends: > >> > >> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) > >> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) > >> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) > >> GCD - GNU Compiler for D > >> DCC - D Compiler Collection > >> > >> Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC. > >Many > >> UNIX systems define the > >> system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler). Hence the system D compiler > >should be > >> DC. GCC is the GNU > >> C Compiler (Well, it was originally. It's now far more than that.) Hence > >the > >> GNU version of DC should > >> be GDC. > >> > >> Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference. > >> > >> Owen > >> > >> In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says... > >> > > >> >I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if > >there > >> >are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. > >One > >> >reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source > >so it > >> >really is a gnu port of the dmd source. > >> >Anyhow, post if you have comments. > >> >-Ben > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > |
February 16, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to C | C wrote:
> what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually. GDC gets my vote.
>
The only problem with gdc is that it's very similar to gdb. (the GNU debugger)
-- andy
|
February 17, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to resistor | resistor@mac.com wrote: > I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas > based on the naming of other GCC frontends: > > GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) > DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) > GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) > GCD - GNU Compiler for D > DCC - D Compiler Collection I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC. New suggestion: ODC - Open D Compiler [...] > Owen -- Justin http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ |
February 17, 2004 Re: gdmd name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to J C Calvarese | In terms of aesthetics, I like GDMD and GDC the best, with GCD and ODC coming in second. But that's just me. Owen In article <c0rp0l$19vh$1@digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says... > >resistor@mac.com wrote: >> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas >> based on the naming of >> other GCC frontends: >> >> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) >> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) >> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) >> GCD - GNU Compiler for D >> DCC - D Compiler Collection > >I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC. > >New suggestion: >ODC - Open D Compiler > >[...] >> Owen > >-- >Justin >http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ > |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation