Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
gdmd name
Feb 15, 2004
Ben Hinkle
Feb 15, 2004
Andy Friesen
Feb 15, 2004
resistor
Feb 15, 2004
John Reimer
Feb 15, 2004
C
Feb 15, 2004
resistor
Feb 15, 2004
C
Feb 16, 2004
Andy Friesen
Feb 17, 2004
J C Calvarese
Feb 17, 2004
resistor
Feb 17, 2004
Ben Hinkle
Feb 17, 2004
J C Calvarese
Feb 18, 2004
resistor
Feb 21, 2004
Robert Jones
Feb 22, 2004
Ben Hinkle
Feb 27, 2004
John Reimer
Feb 27, 2004
resistor
Feb 27, 2004
Kris
February 15, 2004
I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there
are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One
reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it
really is a gnu port of the dmd source.
Anyhow, post if you have comments.
-Ben


February 15, 2004
Ben Hinkle wrote:
> I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there
> are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One
> reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it
> really is a gnu port of the dmd source.
> Anyhow, post if you have comments.
> -Ben

dindm is not digital mars.

*shudder*

 -- andy
February 15, 2004
I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas
based on the naming of
other GCC frontends:

GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler)
DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC)
GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2)
GCD - GNU Compiler for D
DCC - D Compiler Collection

Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC.  Many
UNIX systems define the
system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler).  Hence the system D compiler should be
DC.  GCC is the GNU
C Compiler (Well, it was originally.  It's now far more than that.)  Hence the
GNU version of DC should
be GDC.

Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference.

Owen

In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...
>
>I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there
>are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One
>reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it
>really is a gnu port of the dmd source.
>Anyhow, post if you have comments.
>-Ben
>
>


February 15, 2004
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:42:18 +0000, resisto wrote:

> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas
> based on the naming of
> other GCC frontends:
> 
> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler)
> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC)
> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2)
> GCD - GNU Compiler for D
> DCC - D Compiler Collection
> 

I think DGCC is a good logical start.  GCD is actually funny if you think of it. DCC is not really accurate (it's not really a D compiler collection).

Just an opinion.  Great work!

John R.

February 15, 2004
what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually.  GDC gets my vote.

C
<resistor@mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oi2q$23og$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other
ideas
> based on the naming of
> other GCC frontends:
>
> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler)
> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC)
> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2)
> GCD - GNU Compiler for D
> DCC - D Compiler Collection
>
> Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC.
Many
> UNIX systems define the
> system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler).  Hence the system D compiler
should be
> DC.  GCC is the GNU
> C Compiler (Well, it was originally.  It's now far more than that.)  Hence
the
> GNU version of DC should
> be GDC.
>
> Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference.
>
> Owen
>
> In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...
> >
> >I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if
there
> >are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do.
One
> >reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source
so it
> >really is a gnu port of the dmd source.
> >Anyhow, post if you have comments.
> >-Ben
> >
> >
>
>


February 15, 2004
G77 is so named because it compiles Fortran-77.  Please, let's not get into
naming it like Windows
versions!

Owen

In article <c0oou4$2edt$1@digitaldaemon.com>, C says...
>
>what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually.  GDC gets my vote.
>
>C
><resistor@mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oi2q$23og$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other
>ideas
>> based on the naming of
>> other GCC frontends:
>>
>> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler)
>> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC)
>> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2)
>> GCD - GNU Compiler for D
>> DCC - D Compiler Collection
>>
>> Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC.
>Many
>> UNIX systems define the
>> system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler).  Hence the system D compiler
>should be
>> DC.  GCC is the GNU
>> C Compiler (Well, it was originally.  It's now far more than that.)  Hence
>the
>> GNU version of DC should
>> be GDC.
>>
>> Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference.
>>
>> Owen
>>
>> In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...
>> >
>> >I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if
>there
>> >are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do.
>One
>> >reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source
>so it
>> >really is a gnu port of the dmd source.
>> >Anyhow, post if you have comments.
>> >-Ben
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>


February 15, 2004
Hehe, I was refering to the 2004 1.0 standard , but its no good anyway.

Charlie
<resistor@mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oqkm$2h6n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> G77 is so named because it compiles Fortran-77.  Please, let's not get
into
> naming it like Windows
> versions!
>
> Owen
>
> In article <c0oou4$2edt$1@digitaldaemon.com>, C says...
> >
> >what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually.  GDC gets my
vote.
> >
> >C
> ><resistor@mac.com> wrote in message
news:c0oi2q$23og$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other
> >ideas
> >> based on the naming of
> >> other GCC frontends:
> >>
> >> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler)
> >> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC)
> >> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2)
> >> GCD - GNU Compiler for D
> >> DCC - D Compiler Collection
> >>
> >> Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC.
> >Many
> >> UNIX systems define the
> >> system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler).  Hence the system D compiler
> >should be
> >> DC.  GCC is the GNU
> >> C Compiler (Well, it was originally.  It's now far more than that.)
Hence
> >the
> >> GNU version of DC should
> >> be GDC.
> >>
> >> Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference.
> >>
> >> Owen
> >>
> >> In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...
> >> >
> >> >I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see
if
> >there
> >> >are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't
do.
> >One
> >> >reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd
source
> >so it
> >> >really is a gnu port of the dmd source.
> >> >Anyhow, post if you have comments.
> >> >-Ben
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


February 16, 2004
C wrote:
> what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually.  GDC gets my vote.
> 

The only problem with gdc is that it's very similar to gdb. (the GNU debugger)

 -- andy
February 17, 2004
resistor@mac.com wrote:
> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas
> based on the naming of other GCC frontends:
> 
> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler)
> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC)
> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2)
> GCD - GNU Compiler for D
> DCC - D Compiler Collection

I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC.

New suggestion:
ODC - Open D Compiler

[...]
> Owen

-- 
Justin
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

February 17, 2004
In terms of aesthetics, I like GDMD and GDC the best, with GCD and ODC coming in
second.  But that's
just me.

Owen

In article <c0rp0l$19vh$1@digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says...
>
>resistor@mac.com wrote:
>> I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas
>> based on the naming of
>> other GCC frontends:
>> 
>> GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler)
>> DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC)
>> GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2)
>> GCD - GNU Compiler for D
>> DCC - D Compiler Collection
>
>I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC.
>
>New suggestion:
>ODC - Open D Compiler
>
>[...]
>> Owen
>
>-- 
>Justin
>http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
>


« First   ‹ Prev
1 2