Ilya Minkov wrote:

> "That's very important," the King said, turning to the jury. They were just beginning to write this down on their slates, when the White Rabbit interrupted: "Unimportant, your Majesty means, of course," he said, in a very respectful tone, but frowning and making faces at him as he spoke.
> 
> "Unimportant, of course, I meant," the King hastily said, and went on to himself in an under-tone, "important--unimportant--unimportant--important----" as if he were trying which word sounded best.
> 
> Some of the jury wrote it down "important," and some "unimportant." Alice could see this, as she was near enough to look over their slates; "but it doesn't matter a bit," she thought to herself.
> 
> -eye

He he.

I remember my mother thinking there was absolutely something messed up in the mind of Lewis Carroll, but for some reason I always loved these books. As crazy as they were, they always seemed full of good wholsome satire.

Though posting this here may just be unnecessarily adding fuel to the fire...

John Reimer schrieb:

> He he.
> 
> I remember my mother thinking there was absolutely something messed up in
> the mind of Lewis Carroll, but for some reason I always loved these books. As crazy as they were, they always seemed full of good wholsome satire.
> 
> Though posting this here may just be unnecessarily adding fuel to the
> fire...

Whoops! I missed quotation marks!

We can settle it easily.

--- 8< ---
At this moment the King, who had been for some time busily writing in his note-book, cackled out "Silence!" and read out from his book, "Rule Forty-two. ALL PERSONS MORE THAN A MILE HIGH TO LEAVE THE COURT."
--- >8 ---

which also means that everyone below that height has no reason to feel bad. ;)

-eye

C schrieb:

> :).

Nice i could do something good to this discussion which leads nowhere.

> Theres a misunderstanding, I like the howto's, and I dont care that you post to the newsgroup.  Im asking in addition to the posting to the newsgroup, why don't you put them on the web so its easier to read , and people can find it that aren't in the newsgroup.

Then i think someone can simply add them to the Wiki4D. I think this need not be the Author, because the license for usage of this newsgroup includes, IIRC, that posted material can be used to promote D. I would do it myself if i wasn't that busy picking up a good quote. ;)

> So Long!
> P.S. I only used MN because its in the subject of these HOWTO's

I figured that out. Seems that Manfred has not.

-eye

<snip>

> Then i think someone can simply add them to the Wiki4D. I think this need not be the Author, because the license for usage of this newsgroup includes, IIRC, that posted material can be used to promote D. I would do it myself if i wasn't that busy picking up a good quote. ;)
> 

You mean you weren't quoting from memory?! Ah man, you've just destroyed my admiration for you. ;-)

>> So Long!
>> P.S. I only used MN because its in the subject of these HOWTO's
> 
> I figured that out. Seems that Manfred has not.
> 
> -eye

Well I must admit, it is a little odd to refer to a person by their initials in direct address (especially when their name is known).  But this newsgroup is an odd place, so it's "unimportant." :-)

Ben Hinkle wrote:

[...]
> I had assumed foo
> was called once but the example you gave using opCall made
> me think it gets called again each time the user supplies a ";".

To have a more clear picture I added a "= 0" to the right of such a call
and the compiler spit out:
   'list.opCall(1).opCall(2).opCall(3)' is not an lvalue
Now it is quite obvious, that the compiler prepares only one call to `foo'
aka `list'.

So long!