Thread overview | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 14, 2004 Where in docs? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
This works: struct foo(T) { T x; void getsize() { printf("%d\n", x.size); } } void main(char[][] args) { foo!(int) y; y.getsize(); } I would just like to know where in the documentation this kind of generic programming is listed or if it is listed at all. Thanks, Paul |
June 14, 2004 Re: Where in docs? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Paul Runde | Paul Runde wrote: > This works: > > struct foo(T) > { > T x; > > void getsize() > { > printf("%d\n", x.size); > } > } > > > void main(char[][] args) > { > foo!(int) y; > y.getsize(); > } > > I would just like to know where in the documentation this kind of generic programming is listed or if it is listed at all. > > Thanks, > > Paul I think you've discovered another undocumented template trick. It should be mentioned on http://www.digitalmars.com/d/template.html, but the closest thing seems to be: <quote> If a template declares exactly one member, and that member is a class with the same name as the template: template Bar(T) { class Bar { T member; } } then the semantic equivalent, called a ClassTemplateDeclaration can be written as: class Bar(T) { T member; } </quote> -- Justin (a/k/a jcc7) http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ |
June 14, 2004 Re: Where in docs? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to J C Calvarese | "J C Calvarese" <jcc7@cox.net> escribió en el mensaje news:caj2tv$1use$1@digitaldaemon.com | Paul Runde wrote: || This works: || || struct foo(T) || { || T x; || || void getsize() || { || printf("%d\n", x.size); || } || } || || || void main(char[][] args) || { || foo!(int) y; || y.getsize(); || } || || I would just like to know where in the documentation this kind of || generic programming is listed or if it is listed at all. || || Thanks, || || Paul | | I think you've discovered another undocumented template trick. | | ... | | -- | Justin (a/k/a jcc7) | http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ Where's the trick? struct templates? I think that's been mentioned before... ----------------------- Carlos Santander Bernal |
June 14, 2004 Re: Where in docs? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Carlos Santander B. | Carlos Santander B. wrote: > "J C Calvarese" <jcc7@cox.net> escribió en el mensaje > news:caj2tv$1use$1@digitaldaemon.com > | Paul Runde wrote: > || This works: > || > || struct foo(T) > || { > || T x; > || > || void getsize() > || { > || printf("%d\n", x.size); > || } > || } > || > || > || void main(char[][] args) > || { > || foo!(int) y; > || y.getsize(); > || } > || > || I would just like to know where in the documentation this kind of > || generic programming is listed or if it is listed at all. > || > || Thanks, > || > || Paul > | > | I think you've discovered another undocumented template trick. > | > | ... > | > | -- > | Justin (a/k/a jcc7) > | http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ > > Where's the trick? struct templates? I think that's been mentioned before... > > ----------------------- > Carlos Santander Bernal It may have been mentioned before. My point was that I couldn't find it in the docs. I think it was possible to do the similar class syntax before it was documented. If a similar thing can be done with structs now, it should be documented. -- Justin (a/k/a jcc7) http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ |
June 15, 2004 Re: Where in docs? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to J C Calvarese | "J C Calvarese" <jcc7@cox.net> escribió en el mensaje news:caj93p$2aph$1@digitaldaemon.com | | It may have been mentioned before. My point was that I couldn't find it | in the docs. I think it was possible to do the similar class syntax | before it was documented. If a similar thing can be done with structs | now, it should be documented. | | -- | Justin (a/k/a jcc7) | http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ You're right. ----------------------- Carlos Santander Bernal |
June 15, 2004 Re: Where in docs? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to J C Calvarese | J C Calvarese wrote: > Carlos Santander B. wrote: > > It may have been mentioned before. My point was that I couldn't find it in the docs. I think it was possible to do the similar class syntax before it was documented. If a similar thing can be done with structs now, it should be documented. I suggest writing the amendment and sending it to the bugs forum. Parhaps there should be a d documentation amendments newsgroup. I mean, we don't get many now but if there was one I'm sure there would be many more if there was a place for it. I'm sure that would be a big help to Walter. I'll start a new thread on that matter. -- -Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/ |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation