DMD 0.97: crash with struct sorting

This code causes DMD 0.97 to segfault:

struct Foo {

int opCmp(Foo f)
{
return 0;
}
}

int main(char[][] args)
{
Foo[] foo;

foo.sort;

return 0;
}

---
w2000 DMD 0.97

In article <ceq9g7$25mj$1@digitaldaemon.com>, k2 says...
>
>DMD 0.97: crash with struct sorting
>
>This code causes DMD 0.97 to segfault:
>
>struct Foo {
>
>int opCmp(Foo f)
>{
>return 0;
>}
>}
>
>int main(char[][] args)
>{
>Foo[] foo;
>
>foo.sort;
>
>return 0;
>}
>
>---
>w2000 DMD 0.97
>
>


Presumably Foo.sizeof is zero, which I imagine would cause problems for sort?

Jill

In article <cerbqk$cus$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Arcane Jill says...
>
>Presumably Foo.sizeof is zero, which I imagine would cause problems for sort?
>
>Jill

It's the compiler that crashes, not the program. (A simple test also comfirms that .sort doesn't mind empty arrays.)

Nick

k2 wrote:

> DMD 0.97: crash with struct sorting
> 
> This code causes DMD 0.97 to segfault:
> 
> struct Foo {
> 
> int opCmp(Foo f)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> }
> 
> int main(char[][] args)
> {
> Foo[] foo;
> 
> foo.sort;
> 
> return 0;
> }

Seems to work on Linux.

In article <cers5l$m3a$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Juanjo =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=C1lvarez?= says...
>
>
>Seems to work on Linux.
>

I get a segfault on Linux, haven't tried Windows (but it should be the same.) Since k2 used the word "segfault" I assume that was on Linux as well.

Nick