Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :)

-Deja

In article <ciipd9$lko$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...
>
>Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :)
>
>-Deja
Looks promising :) Unfortunately, I don't have .NET 2.0... can I download a beta from Microsoft?

Hopefully by the time .NET 2.0 is done, D.NET will be more usefull than it is now.

kinghajj wrote:
> In article <ciipd9$lko$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...
> 
>>Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :)
>>
>>-Deja
> 
> Looks promising :) Unfortunately, I don't have .NET 2.0... can I download a beta
> from Microsoft?
> 
> Hopefully by the time .NET 2.0 is done, D.NET will be more usefull than it is
> now.
> 
> 

Yes, just download the Visual C++ 2005 Express Beta.  It comes with the runtimes you need as well as the .NET 2.0 beta

-Deja

In article <cilmmp$1v1l$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...
>
>kinghajj wrote:
>> In article <ciipd9$lko$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...
>> 
>>>Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :)
>>>
>>>-Deja
>> 
>> Looks promising :) Unfortunately, I don't have .NET 2.0... can I download a beta from Microsoft?
>> 
>> Hopefully by the time .NET 2.0 is done, D.NET will be more usefull than it is now.
>> 
>> 
>
>Yes, just download the Visual C++ 2005 Express Beta.  It comes with the runtimes you need as well as the .NET 2.0 beta
>
>-Deja
Is there any way to get .NET 2.0 without downloading VS.NET 2005?

D.NET use .NET 2.0 ? Why don't compile them for .NET 1.1. Cause in future just Longhorn can be use .NET 2.0

"kinghajj" <kinghajj_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:cilqmf$20ng$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> In article <cilmmp$1v1l$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...
> >
> >kinghajj wrote:
> >> In article <ciipd9$lko$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Deja Augustine says...
> >> 
> >>>Added .NET Properties and Enums as well as squashed a few minor bugs. Today has been a good day for D.NET :)
> >>>
> >>>-Deja
> >> 
> >> Looks promising :) Unfortunately, I don't have .NET 2.0... can I download a beta from Microsoft?
> >> 
> >> Hopefully by the time .NET 2.0 is done, D.NET will be more usefull than it is now.
> >> 
> >> 
> >
> >Yes, just download the Visual C++ 2005 Express Beta.  It comes with the runtimes you need as well as the .NET 2.0 beta
> >
> >-Deja
> Is there any way to get .NET 2.0 without downloading VS.NET 2005?
> 
> 

Tu Nam wrote:

> D.NET use .NET 2.0 ? Why don't compile them for .NET 1.1. Cause in future just Longhorn can be use .NET 2.0

I disagree, .NET 2.0 can be used on Windows XP and I think Mono will make a port again to the Linux (and other) platforms.

>>-Deja
> Is there any way to get .NET 2.0 without downloading VS.NET 2005?
>
what about that, hey? http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/downloads/updates/default.aspx

Tu Nam wrote:
> D.NET use .NET 2.0 ? Why don't compile them for .NET 1.1. Cause in future just Longhorn can be use .NET 2.0
> 

D.NET doesn't use anything that's .NET 2.0 specific, but because I compiled it using the VCExpress beta, it bound it to msvcr80d.dll which comes with VCExpress and to .NET 2.0 which also comes with VCExpress.

Once D.NET gets close enough for me to release a beta, I'm going to install VS.NET and recompile it to use msvcr70.dll and .NET 1.x

-Deja