http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 01:19:21 -0800, Walter <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote:

> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>

Weird, I can access the ftp site, but not the web one. All for updates,
though, even if I don't know what they are :D

-- 
"Unhappy Microsoft customers have a funny way of becoming Linux,
Salesforce.com and Oracle customers." - www.microsoft-watch.com:
"The Year in Review: Microsoft Opens Up"

Walter wrote:

> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

As Simon mentioned, the website is inaccessible, but the ftp site works.

I downloaded dmd.109.zip only to find that the dmd version inside is still 0.108. :-(

I've also downloaded dmd.109.zip from the ftp site and dmd shows it's version 109 :-)


John Reimer wrote:
> Walter wrote:
> 
> 
>>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> 
> 
> As Simon mentioned, the website is inaccessible, but the ftp site works.
> 
> I downloaded dmd.109.zip only to find that the dmd version inside is still
> 0.108. :-(

Walter wrote:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

The server seems to be down ATM... first time I've seen that happen ^^

Waaaaahhh... I want my 109! *cries*

-Sebastian

Russell Wilkins wrote:

> I've also downloaded dmd.109.zip from the ftp site and dmd shows it's version 109 :-)
> 
> 

I don't know what's up then.  I've downloaded dmd.109.zip again.  Installed it again: it still comes up 0.108 when I run it. I've checked the zip file and the date on dmd is Nov 30, 2004, the same date as in the dmd.108.zip file.  So I'm perplexed!

Later,

John

John Reimer wrote:

> Russell Wilkins wrote:
> 
>> I've also downloaded dmd.109.zip from the ftp site and dmd shows it's version 109 :-)
>> 
>> 
> 
> I don't know what's up then.  I've downloaded dmd.109.zip again.
> Installed it again: it still comes up 0.108 when I run it. I've checked
> the zip file and the date on dmd is Nov 30, 2004, the same date as in the
> dmd.108.zip
> file.  So I'm perplexed!
> 
> Later,
> 
> John

Even better, the included html documents indicate that this is a 0.109 build in the changelog.  It doesn't make any sense. :-(

Russell Wilkins wrote:

>> 
>> As Simon mentioned, the website is inaccessible, but the ftp site works.
>> 
>> I downloaded dmd.109.zip only to find that the dmd version inside is still 0.108. :-(

I've figured it out. :-P

We're talking about two different platforms.  The windows dmd.exe is updated.  It's the linux dmd in the package that is not.  I hope that this is remedied soon. :-)

John Reimer wrote:
> John Reimer wrote:
> 
> 
>>Russell Wilkins wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I've also downloaded dmd.109.zip from the ftp site and dmd shows it's
>>>version 109 :-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I don't know what's up then.  I've downloaded dmd.109.zip again. Installed it again: it still comes up 0.108 when I run it. I've checked
>>the zip file and the date on dmd is Nov 30, 2004, the same date as in the
>>dmd.108.zip
>>file.  So I'm perplexed!
>>
>>Later,
>>
>>John
> 
> 
> Even better, the included html documents indicate that this is a 0.109 build
> in the changelog.  It doesn't make any sense. :-(

Just downloaded dmd.109.zip and got v0.109. Don't know John, you're on your own on this one.

Andrew

Sebastian Beschke <s.beschke@gmx.de> for some reason wrote:

> Walter wrote:
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
> 
> The server seems to be down ATM... first time I've seen that happen ^^
> 
> Waaaaahhh... I want my 109! *cries*
> 
> -Sebastian


ftp://digitalmars.com/dmd.109.zip

The http server is down, the ftp is still up :-)


KTC

-- 
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
    - Heinrich Heine