First I have to thank Walter for the latest batch of features added to D. I'm sure I'll be using Lazy Evaluation and Function Literals a lot.

Now we have one more "literal" in our language but some basic ones are still missing. Struct Literal and Array Literal have been previously discussed in length and I'm gonna skip the reasons and just add some links to past discussions:

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/28621.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/17267.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/25674.html
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/12920.html

Array Literals are also mentioned here as if D had them already:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/builtin.html

What do you think? Should D 1.0 have this expressions?

There's also another feature (Anonymous Structs) that I'm still missing but that's probably a D 2.0 thing.

Julio César Carrascal Urquijo wrote:
> First I have to thank Walter for the latest batch of features added to D. I'm sure I'll be using Lazy Evaluation and Function Literals a lot.
> 
> Now we have one more "literal" in our language but some basic ones are still missing. Struct Literal and Array Literal have been previously discussed in length and I'm gonna skip the reasons and just add some links to past discussions:
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/28621.html
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/17267.html
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/25674.html
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/12920.html
> 
> Array Literals are also mentioned here as if D had them already:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/builtin.html
> 
> What do you think? Should D 1.0 have this expressions?
> 
> There's also another feature (Anonymous Structs) that I'm still missing but that's probably a D 2.0 thing.

That stuff would be nice, but IMO it can wait until after 1.0.  It doesn't break backwards compatibility, so after 1.0 it won't have to wait until 2.0, assuming we leave backwards breaking changes until each next major version.  Also, I just don't see the lack of these features as harming to D's image as other things like erraneous documentation on the digitalmars d website or ... 'access violation' (could we get line numbers or something?).