September 03, 2006
I think this use to work; now on Linux, it reports:

Error: need opCmp for class Bar

(see attachment).
September 03, 2006
%u wrote:
> I think this use to work; now on Linux, it reports:
> 
> Error: need opCmp for class Bar
> 
> (see attachment).
> begin 644 opcmp.d
> M=&5M<&QA=&4@5F%L=6%B;&4H5"D@>PIP<F]T96-T960Z"B`@9FQO870@;5]V
> M86QU92`](#`N,#L*"G!U8FQI8SH*("!F;&]A="!V86QU92@I("![<F5T=7)N
> M(&U?=F%L=64[?0H@('9O:60@('9A;'5E*&9L;V%T('8I("![;5]V86QU93UV
> M.WT*("!I;G0@;W!#;7`H5"!O=&AE<BD@>PH@("`@:6YT('(["B`@("`*("`@
> M(&EF("`@("`@*'9A;'5E(#P@;W1H97(N=F%L=64I("![<B`]("TQ.WT*("`@
> M(&5L<V4@:68@*'9A;'5E(#X@;W1H97(N=F%L=64I("![<B`]("`Q.WT*("`@
> M(`H@("`@<F5T=7)N('(["B`@?0I]"@IC;&%S<R!&;V\@>PI]"@IC;&%S<R!"
> M87(@.B!&;V\@>PH@(&UI>&EN("!686QU86)L92$H0F%R*3L@("\O(&1E9FEN
> M960@;W!#;7`@=&\@8V]M<&%R92!"87(*"G!U8FQI8SH*("!T:&ES*&9L;V%T
> M('8I('L*("`@(&U?=F%L=64@/2!V.PH@('T*?0H*:6YT(&UA:6XH8VAA<EM=
> M6UT@87)G<RD@>PH@($)A<ELS72!B87)S.PH*("!F;W(@*&EN="!I(#T@,#L@
> M:2`\(#,[(&DK*RD@>PH@("`@8F%R<UMI72`](&YE=R!"87(H:2D["B`@?0H@
> <(&)A<G,N<V]R=#L*"B`@<F5T=7)N(#`["GT*"@``
> `
> end

Oh dear, looks like there's a bug with the web interface.  This jumble has come up as being part of the message body, not as an attachment.

But I've manage to look at it using uudecode.  Looks like a bug indeed.

It would be better to just paste such short code examples straight into the message rather than trying to attach them.

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.