Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 08, 2006 std.perf | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer. |
October 09, 2006 Re: std.perf | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Lutger | Lutger wrote: > Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer. Honestly, I think its just an oversight. D's perf module is actually a port, however, of a C++ library (STLSoft:WinSTL). The best I can recommend is to examine the D source (dmd/src/phobos/std/perf.d) and the documentation for the C++ version: http://synesis.com.au/software/stlsoft/help/group__winstl__perf__library.html -- Christopher Nicholson-Sauls |
October 10, 2006 Re: std.perf | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Chris Nicholson-Sauls | I see, that explains the doxygen doc. It seems that ddoc can deal with doxygen in a reasonable way though. Initially I thought it might be like recls, still shipped with phobos but not really a part of it as I understand.
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
> Lutger wrote:
>> Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.
>
> Honestly, I think its just an oversight. D's perf module is actually a port, however, of a C++ library (STLSoft:WinSTL). The best I can recommend is to examine the D source (dmd/src/phobos/std/perf.d) and the documentation for the C++ version:
> http://synesis.com.au/software/stlsoft/help/group__winstl__perf__library.html
>
>
> -- Christopher Nicholson-Sauls
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation