Hi
I found a benchmark page for web frameworks.
http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r12&hw=peak&test=query

Here, vibe.d was lost somewhere in bottom of slowest frameworks, what surprise me.
I tried some test out, compared jetty, servlets, grails, php and vibe.d with completely different result.
Running on my laptop and measured by Chrome's network time function vibe.d was in ms area, jetty close to seconds and php between. Servlets and grails are the slowest on my machine (Linux Mint 17.3 / 64bit / 16 GB RAM / i7)

And from the technical point of view, I'm sure some results must be wrong.
So I shake my head in surprise and ask the community what they think about techempower's benchmarks.

Regards, Ozan

On Friday, 26 February 2016 at 12:14:03 UTC, Ozan wrote:
> Hi
> I found a benchmark page for web frameworks.
> http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r12&hw=peak&test=query
>
> Here, vibe.d was lost somewhere in bottom of slowest frameworks, what surprise me.
> I tried some test out, compared jetty, servlets, grails, php and vibe.d with completely different result.
> Running on my laptop and measured by Chrome's network time function vibe.d was in ms area, jetty close to seconds and php between. Servlets and grails are the slowest on my machine (Linux Mint 17.3 / 64bit / 16 GB RAM / i7)
>
> And from the technical point of view, I'm sure some results must be wrong.
> So I shake my head in surprise and ask the community what they think about techempower's benchmarks.
>
> Regards, Ozan

It seems to be at the bottom because of "vibe.d — Did not complete"

Am 26.02.2016 um 13:14 schrieb Ozan:
> Hi
> I found a benchmark page for web frameworks.
> http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r12&hw=peak&test=query
>
> Here, vibe.d was lost somewhere in bottom of slowest frameworks, what
> surprise me.
> I tried some test out, compared jetty, servlets, grails, php and vibe.d
> with completely different result.
> Running on my laptop and measured by Chrome's network time function
> vibe.d was in ms area, jetty close to seconds and php between. Servlets
> and grails are the slowest on my machine (Linux Mint 17.3 / 64bit / 16
> GB RAM / i7)
>
> And from the technical point of view, I'm sure some results must be wrong.
> So I shake my head in surprise and ask the community what they think
> about techempower's benchmarks.
>
> Regards, Ozan

Unfortunately they didn't look at my PR (https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/1916), which was submitted before their deadline for changes that still go into round 12. 0.7.27 had a performance bug where it basically didn't scale to multiple threads at all. They are using a 24-core machine or so, so the penalty is huge. I'll have to have another look at why some of the tests didn't complete, though.