December 29, 2006 GDC vs DMD - performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
How is the performance of GDC vs DMD? I ran some simple benchmarks that showed DMD significantly faster but I'm wondering what other people have found. |
December 29, 2006 Re: GDC vs DMD - performance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to kmk | I suppose I should retract my original statement. I ran some more rough benchmarks using code from http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ (Source is given when I could find the link -- source files can also be downloaded from the site as a package) Here are some of the results: Ackermann - GDC 2.6X faster, 19% less memory binary trees -http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/debian/benchmark.php?test=binarytrees&lang=dlang&id=0 - DMD 5X faster, GDC 38% less memory fibonacci - GDC 15% faster and 11% less memory matrix - GDC 2X faster, GDC 12% less memory recursive -Source:http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/debian/benchmark.php?test=recursive&lang=dlang&id=0 - GDC 1.8X faster and 12.5% less memory partial sums -Source:http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4sandbox/benchmark.php?test=partialsums&lang=dlang - GDC 25% faster and 10% less memory method calls - DMD 2.6X faster, GDC 12% less memory dispatch - DMD 16% faster, GDC 12% less memory |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation