Thread overview |
---|
April 04, 2007 slightly moronic gdc error: string template parameters plus unittest == endless glee | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
I have the following line somewhere in my source. class database(RECORD) { //RECORD[] list; record!("name", char[])[] list; } Now, if I switch unittests on, gdc (0.23, MinGW 4.1.2) emits the following code: .stabs "record!("name",char[]) []:Tt(1,30)=s8length:(1,7),0,32;ptr:(1,31)=*(1,32)=xsrecord:,32,32;;",128,0,55,0 Note the "outer" '"'s and the "inner" '"'s. Unsurprisingly, the assembler barfs on this. -- still laughing, downs |
April 05, 2007 Re: slightly moronic gdc error: string template parameters plus unittest == endless glee | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Downs | I wrote: > I have the following line somewhere in my source. > class database(RECORD) { > //RECORD[] list; > record!("name", char[])[] list; > } > > Now, if I switch unittests on Also seems to happen in debug mode. Basically, anything that makes gdc emit the stabs entry. > , gdc (0.23, MinGW 4.1.2) emits the following code: > .stabs "record!("name",char[]) []:Tt(1,30)=s8length:(1,7),0,32;ptr:(1,31)=*(1,32)=xsrecord:,32,32;;",128,0,55,0 > > Note the "outer" '"'s and the "inner" '"'s. > Unsurprisingly, the assembler barfs on this. > -- still laughing, downs |
April 05, 2007 Re: slightly moronic gdc error: string template parameters plus unittest == endless glee | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Downs | I wrote:
> I have the following line somewhere in my source.
> class database(RECORD) {
> //RECORD[] list;
> record!("name", char[])[] list;
> }
>
> Now, if I switch unittests on, gdc (0.23, MinGW 4.1.2) emits the following code:
> .stabs "record!("name",char[]) []:Tt(1,30)=s8length:(1,7),0,32;ptr:(1,31)=*(1,32)=xsrecord:,32,32;;",128,0,55,0
>
> Note the "outer" '"'s and the "inner" '"'s.
> Unsurprisingly, the assembler barfs on this.
> -- still laughing, downs
Manually escaping the inside ""s in the .s file (.stabs "record!(\"name\" ... ") seems to make it work; maybe we should do that.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation