| |
| Posted by RazvanN in reply to Matheus | PermalinkReply |
|
RazvanN
Posted in reply to Matheus
| On Monday, 25 July 2022 at 11:34:24 UTC, Matheus wrote:
> On Monday, 25 July 2022 at 08:52:55 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
>> ...
>
> Hi RazvanN, first of all thanks for the update report.
>
> One thing that called my attention is the Issues marked as Invalid, for example: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14553 .
>
> It was opened 7 years ago, and It seems to be valid and according to the last comment:
>
> "Daraban Timotei 2022-07-23 11:10:45 UTC
>
> Documentation has changed and no longer conflicts with return types."
>
> So now the documentation doesn't conflict, and 7 years later the issue turned to be invalid, but I wonder if a better flag should be used like "Automatically fixed", "Already Fixed", "Auto Solved" etc. Instead of just flagging as "Invalid" after so many years, since it was valid once.
>
> Matheus.
Yes, in this case the documentation was changed to match the behavior, therefore the issue should have been marked as fixed.
|