Does std.signals in Tangobos work now that Tango has rt_attachDisposeEvent and rt_detachDisposeEvent?  A quick glance at the Tangobos source in SVN suggests not.   But maybe notifyRegister/notifyUnRegister implementations are provided in some way that's not obvious to me.

--bb

That would be a good question to ask on the IRC channels ;)

#d.tango @ freenode.net



"Bill Baxter" <dnewsgroup@billbaxter.com> wrote in message news:fnig3j$2vu3$1@digitalmars.com...
> Does std.signals in Tangobos work now that Tango has rt_attachDisposeEvent and rt_detachDisposeEvent?  A quick glance at the Tangobos source in SVN suggests not.   But maybe notifyRegister/notifyUnRegister implementations are provided in some way that's not obvious to me.
>
> --bb

Kris wrote:
> That would be a good question to ask on the IRC channels ;)
> 
> #d.tango @ freenode.net
> 

Figuring out how to log on to irc always ends up taking me the better part of an hour.   Just not worth it.

Guess I'm just too old for IRC.  Now get off my lawn!

--bb

Bill Baxter wrote:
> Does std.signals in Tangobos work now that Tango has rt_attachDisposeEvent and rt_detachDisposeEvent?  A quick glance at the Tangobos source in SVN suggests not.   But maybe notifyRegister/notifyUnRegister implementations are provided in some way that's not obvious to me.

Not yet.  I've yet to fix it since the change to Tango.


Sean

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> Does std.signals in Tangobos work now that Tango has rt_attachDisposeEvent and rt_detachDisposeEvent?  A quick glance at the Tangobos source in SVN suggests not.   But maybe notifyRegister/notifyUnRegister implementations are provided in some way that's not obvious to me.
> 
> Not yet.  I've yet to fix it since the change to Tango.

Done :-)


Sean