Thread overview
JFace Port
Apr 16, 2008
JMNorris
Apr 16, 2008
arnaud
Apr 16, 2008
Frank Benoit
Apr 17, 2008
Bill Baxter
Apr 17, 2008
John Reimer
Apr 17, 2008
JMNorris
Apr 17, 2008
Jacob Carlborg
April 16, 2008
As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or will be called dface.

-- 
JMNorris
April 16, 2008
I think it's a good idea, DMNorris

JMNorris a écrit :
> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
> will be called dface.
> 
April 16, 2008
JMNorris Wrote:

> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or will be called dface.

No, i have not plans to do this.



April 17, 2008
Frank Benoit wrote:
> JMNorris Wrote:
> 
>> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
>> will be called dface.
> 
> No, i have not plans to do this.

Let's pretend it stands for something else in the D version.

J is for...Jiffy.
JFace let's you create an interFace in a Jiffy.  JFace.
It'll make you do a little Jiggy for Joy.
It might give you such a Jolly Jolt you'll want to Jot down all your code in D.  Time for a Jelly sandwich now...

--bb
April 17, 2008
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:22:05 +0000, JMNorris wrote:

> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or will be called dface.


Actually, it's a bit of a stretch calling DWT "DWT".  It's really just a port of SWT, not a new thing.  The name "DWT" has kind of stuck, though; so, among other things, it's here to stay.

JFace is another matter.  Naming it "DFace" would have implications that just wouldn't be suitable for any respectable D port. :)

-JJR
April 17, 2008
John Reimer <terminal.node@gmail.com> wrote in news:fu6flc$1c2m$1 @digitalmars.com:

> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:22:05 +0000, JMNorris wrote:
> 
>> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or will be called dface.
> 
> 
> Actually, it's a bit of a stretch calling DWT "DWT".  It's really just a port of SWT, not a new thing.  The name "DWT" has kind of stuck, though; so, among other things, it's here to stay.
> 
> JFace is another matter.  Naming it "DFace" would have implications that just wouldn't be suitable for any respectable D port. :)

Actually, I find it kinda cute--the D port with an attitude. :-)  At any rate, it's probably better than DJFace:  there's probably a reason the DJ is on radio rather than TV, and it's not his voice.

-- 
JMNorris
April 17, 2008
JMNorris wrote:
> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
> will be called dface.
> 
I like the name "dface", I think it's a very good name for the port.