Reply to janderson,

> 
> Call it like:
> 
> this.Templet()!("foo")(arg)
> 
> //Might simplify to due to D's magic property stuff
> this.Templet!("foo")(arg)
> 
> Something like that. Haven't tried it so don't know if it would work
> and what massaging would be needed.
> 
> -Joel
> 

that still wouldn't work in my case because I'm looking at mucking with the vtbl to, at runtime generate new types. (yes I know I'm crazy)

BCS wrote:
> Reply to janderson,
> 
>>
>> Call it like:
>>
>> this.Templet()!("foo")(arg)
>>
>> //Might simplify to due to D's magic property stuff
>> this.Templet!("foo")(arg)
>>
>> Something like that. Haven't tried it so don't know if it would work
>> and what massaging would be needed.
>>
>> -Joel
>>
> 
> that still wouldn't work in my case because I'm looking at mucking with the vtbl to, at runtime generate new types. (yes I know I'm crazy)
> 
> 

Humm.  Maybe not.  There is a vtable in there (although not one entry by type and there's one more level of function indirection.  I guess what I'm saying is the delegate/method that is passed into the TemplateMaker is like an entry in a vtable, and TemplateMaker is like the container for that entry (something like that).  I imagine you could write something special case for that particular case, its just code right?

But I can see your point.

-Joel