Pretty much just as the subject says. It's rare and far from major, but I've come across a few places where it would be nice to be able to say "if(A ^^ B)" instead of "if(A && !B || !A && B)".

Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Pretty much just as the subject says. It's rare and far from major, but I've come across a few places where it would be nice to be able to say "if(A ^^ B)" instead of "if(A && !B || !A && B)". 
> 
> 

!= is xor, genius.

 - Gregor Richards

"Gregor Richards" <Richards@codu.org> wrote in message news:486DA24F.3090706@codu.org...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Pretty much just as the subject says. It's rare and far from major, but I've come across a few places where it would be nice to be able to say "if(A ^^ B)" instead of "if(A && !B || !A && B)".
>
> != is xor, genius.
>
>  - Gregor Richards

Heh, oh yea :)

if((x == 1) != (y != 2))

No reason for that not to work.

Too tired today :)

Gregor Richards Wrote:

> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > Pretty much just as the subject says. It's rare and far from major, but I've come across a few places where it would be nice to be able to say "if(A ^^ B)" instead of "if(A && !B || !A && B)".
> > 
> > 
> 
> != is xor, genius.

and <= is implication btw. but it does exhaustive evaluation unfortunately.