| Thread overview | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
July 27, 2008 Not just for cryptography | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography: http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid= Bye, bearophile | ||||
July 28, 2008 Re: Not just for cryptography | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile | bearophile wrote:
> Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography:
> http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid=
Avoiding computation overflow is never a bad thing :)
Sean
| |||
August 11, 2008 Re: Not just for cryptography | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to bearophile | bearophile wrote: > Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography: > http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid= > > Bye, > bearophile That's what happens when people use "undefined" behavior as an ambiguous expression that can mean both "illegal" behavior, and "unspecified in some aspects but valid" behavior. Illegal behavior should be called illegal behavior, period. (http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/2008-April/036814.html) -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D | |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply