Thread overview
Not just for cryptography
Jul 27, 2008
bearophile
Jul 28, 2008
Sean Kelly
Aug 11, 2008
Bruno Medeiros
July 27, 2008
Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography: http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid=

Bye,
bearophile
July 28, 2008
bearophile wrote:
> Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography:
> http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid=

Avoiding computation overflow is never a bad thing :)


Sean
August 11, 2008
bearophile wrote:
> Another little story for people that think the multi-precision integers are mostly good for cryptography:
> http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=614&Itemid=
> 
> Bye,
> bearophile

That's what happens when people use "undefined" behavior as an ambiguous expression that can mean both "illegal" behavior, and "unspecified in some aspects but valid" behavior.
Illegal behavior should be called illegal behavior, period. (http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/2008-April/036814.html)


-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Developer, MSc. in CS/E graduate
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D