| Thread overview | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
October 14, 2008 Re: Another syntactic under-performer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Bill Baxter Wrote: > I've seen a few > interesting proposals that wanted to use colons but which ran into > troubles with ambiguity vs goto and switch labels. But switch case > labels are already inside a syntactically distinct structure, so it > should be easy to change them to just about any syntax. there was interesting proposal for if-style case statement, which gives real structure to switch statement! http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=77141 | ||||
October 14, 2008 Re: Another syntactic under-performer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ore-sama | On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:59 PM, ore-sama <spam@here.lot> wrote:
> Bill Baxter Wrote:
>
>> I've seen a few
>> interesting proposals that wanted to use colons but which ran into
>> troubles with ambiguity vs goto and switch labels. But switch case
>> labels are already inside a syntactically distinct structure, so it
>> should be easy to change them to just about any syntax.
>
> there was interesting proposal for if-style case statement, which gives real structure to switch statement! http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=77141
>
I saw the thread. Like some others, I didn't really get the need for
that particular change.
I'd give it another look right now, but unfortunately links to that
web-news interface don't work right. :-( That link goes to an
unrelated discussion.
--bb
| |||
October 14, 2008 Re: Another syntactic under-performer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bill Baxter | Bill Baxter Wrote: > > http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=77141 > > > > I saw the thread. Like some others, I didn't really get the need for > that particular change. > I'd give it another look right now, but unfortunately links to that > web-news interface don't work right. :-( That link goes to an > unrelated discussion. > > --bb script has problem with art_group parameter, edit it manually to hold real group name: art_group=digitalmars.D art_group=digitalmars.D.announce art_group=digitalmars.D.learn | |||
October 14, 2008 Re: Another syntactic under-performer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ore-sama | On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM, ore-sama <spam@here.lot> wrote:
> Bill Baxter Wrote:
>
>> > http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=77141
>> >
>>
>> I saw the thread. Like some others, I didn't really get the need for
>> that particular change.
>> I'd give it another look right now, but unfortunately links to that
>> web-news interface don't work right. :-( That link goes to an
>> unrelated discussion.
>>
>> --bb
>
> script has problem with art_group parameter, edit it manually to hold real group name:
> art_group=digitalmars.D
> art_group=digitalmars.D.announce
> art_group=digitalmars.D.learn
Oh wait.. that was the right post. It was just #4 out of 4 points. Sorry I just missed it.
--bb
| |||
October 14, 2008 Re: Another syntactic under-performer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Bill Baxter <wbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM, ore-sama <spam@here.lot> wrote:
>> Bill Baxter Wrote:
>>
>>> > http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=77141
>>> >
>>>
>>> I saw the thread. Like some others, I didn't really get the need for
>>> that particular change.
>>> I'd give it another look right now, but unfortunately links to that
>>> web-news interface don't work right. :-( That link goes to an
>>> unrelated discussion.
>>>
>>> --bb
>>
>> script has problem with art_group parameter, edit it manually to hold real group name:
>> art_group=digitalmars.D
>> art_group=digitalmars.D.announce
>> art_group=digitalmars.D.learn
>
> Oh wait.. that was the right post. It was just #4 out of 4 points. Sorry I just missed it.
The proposal was this:
"""
4. Replace C-style switch with something modern and more D-like:
switch (x)
{
case (0) foo();
case (1)
{
bar();
baz();
}
else throw new Exception("nope");
}
"""
The question is why? Replacing syntax just to look "more modern" is not a good justification for breaking everyone's code.
But if you have the goal of freeing up the colon for bigger and better things, I suppose that doesn't seem like a bad syntax. I don't think it would kill the Duff's device, either. It's just a different syntax for the current switch.
Excuse me now.. while I "free up my colon for bigger and better things".
--bb
| ||||
October 14, 2008 Re: Another syntactic under-performer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bill Baxter | Bill Baxter Wrote:
> It's just a different syntax for the current switch.
as it was noted, current case is just a type of label. In this proposal case is a scope statement like if.
| |||
October 14, 2008 Re: Another syntactic under-performer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ore-sama | On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM, ore-sama <spam@here.lot> wrote:
> Bill Baxter Wrote:
>
>> It's just a different syntax for the current switch.
>
> as it was noted, current case is just a type of label. In this proposal case is a scope statement like if.
Ah, I see. Well, it's really a different goal than this thread in that case. But very similar syntax could be used with current switch semantics to help free up the colon.
--bb
| |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply