Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> Actually, it is not about immediate notification - you can no longer
> receive SMS I think for those you follow. It is more that a "busy"
> developer/person can easily write a short note about the progress
> without it seeing out of place - if you use a blog you are
> "obligated" to write a longer piece which takes more time and thus is
> less likely that you do.

I have that problem with my Dr. Dobb's blog. A blog is shorter than an article, but lots of people have commented that my blog entries are too short. The problem with an article length one is, of course, the time involved in writing it. I also suspect that fewer readers would read it if it were article length.

> It has also become an easy way to aggregate - by using @ or # and
> some name or identifier, your message can be directed here and there
> depending on the topic. As Brad say, it may be a bit weird, but it is
> very convenient for aggregating short tidbits on a subject.
> 
> In case you are curious; my account ;)
> 
> http://twitter.com/larsivi

I might just check it out.

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> In case you are curious; my account ;)
> 
> http://twitter.com/larsivi

Oddly, I cannot add your name. Twitter insists that in order to add people, I must have an email address on hotmail.

Anyhow, my twitter account name is WalterBright.

Walter Bright wrote:
> Oddly, I cannot add your name. Twitter insists that in order to add people, I must have an email address on hotmail.

Never mind, I figured it out.

== Quote from Walter Bright (newshound1@digitalmars.com)'s article
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> > In case you are curious; my account ;)
> >
> > http://twitter.com/larsivi
> Oddly, I cannot add your name. Twitter insists that in order to add people, I must have an email address on hotmail.

That's weird.  I was able to add you by going to http://twitter.com/walterbright and clicking "follow."

(I broke down and created a Twitter account today also)


Sean