February 09, 2009 Re: Old problem with performance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Weed Wrote: > naryl �����: > > Weed Wrote: > >> Denis Koroskin ���������������: > >> > >>> And here are results (best/average of 3 runs): > >>> > >>> DMD2.023 - 12.492/12.576 ms (-O -inline) > >>> DMC8.42n - 13.941/14.131 ms (-O -inline) > >>> > >>> > >> Try to return from value() a class instance > > > > In this case both C++ and D performance drops almost tenfold. > > Hmmm. Can you show code? Yes. It's in the attachment: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=83523 | ||||
February 09, 2009 Re: Old problem with performance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to naryl | naryl пишет:
> Weed Wrote:
>> naryl яПНяПНяПНяПНяПН:
>>> Weed Wrote:
>>>> Denis Koroskin яПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПНяПН:
>>>>
>>>>> And here are results (best/average of 3 runs):
>>>>>
>>>>> DMD2.023 - 12.492/12.576 ms (-O -inline)
>>>>> DMC8.42n - 13.941/14.131 ms (-O -inline)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Try to return from value() a class instance
>>> In this case both C++ and D performance drops almost tenfold.
May be performance do not fall, it become equally high?
| |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply