Thread overview
Re: in vs. const
Mar 09, 2009
Kagamin
Mar 09, 2009
Denis Koroskin
Mar 09, 2009
Kagamin
March 09, 2009
Sergey Gromov Wrote:

> In D2, 'in' means 'const scope'.  I've seen that in writing but can't remember where.

How can it be scope? If you have scope object, it gets *destructed* when leaving scope: when function exits. Ouch.
March 09, 2009
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:07:05 +0300, Kagamin <spam@here.lot> wrote:

> Sergey Gromov Wrote:
>
>> In D2, 'in' means 'const scope'.  I've seen that in writing but can't
>> remember where.
>
> How can it be scope? If you have scope object, it gets *destructed* when leaving scope: when function exits. Ouch.

No. Scope has different meaning here. For example, delegates don't cause heap allocation when passed as scope parameters in D2.

March 09, 2009
Denis Koroskin Wrote:

> No. Scope has different meaning here.

O RLY? That's good news.