Walter, three years ago, when you last compiled htod, linux was an unfamiliar thing, right? Now that you're regularly roaming OSX, linux &co, would it be a big thing to make a non-windows version, too?

On Fri, 08 May 2009 16:21:13 +0400, Georg Wrede <georg.wrede@iki.fi> wrote:

>
> Walter, three years ago, when you last compiled htod, linux was an unfamiliar thing, right? Now that you're regularly roaming OSX, linux &co, would it be a big thing to make a non-windows version, too?

Did you try BCD? http://www.dsource.org/projects/bcd

I never used it myself, but I hope I'll help you.

Georg Wrede wrote:
> 
> Walter, three years ago, when you last compiled htod, linux was an unfamiliar thing, right? Now that you're regularly roaming OSX, linux &co, would it be a big thing to make a non-windows version, too?

htod is built from the Digital Mars C compiler. In order to make one for Linux, it would have to support all of gcc's extensions which are used in the header files.

Walter Bright wrote:
> Georg Wrede wrote:
>>
>> Walter, three years ago, when you last compiled htod, linux was an unfamiliar thing, right? Now that you're regularly roaming OSX, linux &co, would it be a big thing to make a non-windows version, too?
> 
> htod is built from the Digital Mars C compiler. In order to make one for Linux, it would have to support all of gcc's extensions which are used in the header files.

Ouch. Never saw that coming.